Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 20;2010(1):CD003974. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003974.pub3

Linde 2005.

Methods Design: three group parallel trial 
 Purpose: study the effect of acupuncture on migraine
Participants Patients: out‐patients with migraine headache 
 Baseline comparability: yes
Interventions Placebo: needling at places not regarded true acupuncture sites 
 Untreated: no needling 
 Experimental: needling at places regarded true acupuncture sites 
 (Co‐intervention: standard headache treatment according to the guideline of the German Migraine and Headache Society)
Outcomes Number of headache days of moderate or severe intensity until week 9‐12 
 Number of migraine headaches 
 Total number of headache days 
 Proportion of treatment responders 
 Number of days with medication 
 Pain disability index 
 Scale for assessing the emotional aspects of pain 
 Algemeine Depressionskalla 
 SF‐36
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Low risk 'random list generated with Sample Size 2.0'
Allocation concealment? Low risk 'centralized telephone randomization procedure'
Blinding? 
 Treatment provider High risk Not described as double‐blind (placebo/acupuncture)
Blinding? 
 Outcome assessor Unclear risk Not relevant as patient reported outcome
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All outcomes Low risk Drop‐out < 15%
Free of selective reporting? Low risk Primary outcome specified in protocol
Free of other bias? Low risk  
No signs of variance inequality or skewness? Unclear risk Not relevant (not naturally positive continuous outcomes e.g. change)
Trial size > 49? Low risk N = 157
Clearly concealed allocation + trial size > 49 + drop‐out max 15% Low risk All three categories fulfilled