Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 20;2010(1):CD003974. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003974.pub3

Matros 2006.

Methods Design: three group parallel trial 
 Purpose: study the effect of gum chewing on postoperative ileus
Participants Patients: in‐patients having had performed abdominal surgery 
 Baseline comparability: yes (age, gender)
Interventions Placebo: Acupressure bracelet used on an inert location 
 Untreated: no chewing gum or bracelet 
 Experimental: chewing gum 
 (Co‐intervention: standard postoperative care)
Outcomes Time to first flatus 
 Time to first bowel movement 
 Time to ready for discharge 
 Time to actual discharge
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear risk 'computer‐generated'
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk NS
Blinding? 
 Treatment provider High risk Not described as double‐blind (placebo/chewing gum)
Blinding? 
 Outcome assessor Unclear risk NS
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All outcomes High risk Drop‐out > 15% or NS
Free of selective reporting? Unclear risk No protocol available
Free of other bias? Low risk  
No signs of variance inequality or skewness? Low risk No variance inequality (F‐test not statistically significant) and no skewness (1.64 standard deviations does not exceed the mean)
Trial size > 49? High risk N = 44
Clearly concealed allocation + trial size > 49 + drop‐out max 15% High risk Trial size < 49