Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 20;2010(1):CD003974. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003974.pub3

May 1988.

Methods Design: four group, four period cross‐over trial 
 Purpose: examine the effect of terbutaline, isotonic saline, ambient air and no‐treatment on chronic airway obstruction in asthmatics
Participants Patients: asthmatic out‐patients with reversible chronic airway obstruction 
 Baseline comparability: no carry‐over effect
Interventions Placebo: 
 ‐inhalation of air from a noisy nebulizer 
 ‐inhalation of isotonic saline from a noisy nebulizer 
 Untreated: inhalation of air through a mouthpiece disconnected from the nebulizer 
 Experimental: inhalation of terbutaline from a noisy nebulizer 
 (Co‐intervention: use of corticosteroids or bronchodilator drugs prohibited)
Outcomes Change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) 
 Change in forced vital capacity (FVC)
Notes The outcome data was not available from the first period only, and was calculated as deriving from a parallel group trial.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear risk NS
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk NS
Blinding? 
 Treatment provider Low risk 'The treatment was given double‐blind...'
Blinding? 
 Outcome assessor Low risk '... but the nurse in charge of spirometry did not know whether or not the patient was receiving treatment'
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All outcomes High risk Drop‐out > 15% or NS
Free of selective reporting? Unclear risk No protocol available
Free of other bias? Unclear risk The outcome data from this cross‐over trial was not available from the first period only, and was calculated as deriving from a parallel group trial.
No signs of variance inequality or skewness? Unclear risk Not relevant (not naturally positive continuous outcomes e.g. change)
Trial size > 49? High risk N = 48
Clearly concealed allocation + trial size > 49 + drop‐out max 15% High risk Trial size < 49