Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 20;2010(1):CD003974. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003974.pub3

Nandi 1976.

Methods Design: three group parallel trial 
 Purpose: examine the effect of imipramine on depression in patients not spontaneously seeking treatment
Participants Patients: out‐patients with clinical depression identified through a door to door survey in a rural community 
 Baseline comparability: yes (score on Hamilton's depressive rating scale)
Interventions Placebo: tablets without imipramine (lactose) 
 Untreated: no tablets (observational group) 
 Experimental: tablets with imipramine 
 (Co‐intervention: NS)
Outcomes Score on Hamilton's rating scale
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear risk NS
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk NS
Blinding? 
 Treatment provider Unclear risk NS
Blinding? 
 Outcome assessor Unclear risk NS
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All outcomes Low risk Drop‐out < 15%
Free of selective reporting? Unclear risk No protocol available
Free of other bias? Low risk  
No signs of variance inequality or skewness? Low risk No variance inequality (F‐test not statistically significant) and no skewness (1.64 standard deviations does not exceed the mean)
Trial size > 49? High risk N = 18
Clearly concealed allocation + trial size > 49 + drop‐out max 15% High risk Trial size < 49