Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 20;2010(1):CD003974. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003974.pub3

O'Brien 1996.

Methods Design: three group parallel trial 
 Purpose: examine the effect of acupressure on nausea associated with pregnancy
Participants Patients: pregnant women with nausea 
 Baseline comparability: yes for baseline nausea
Interventions Placebo: acupressure on a neutral point (not P6) 
 Untreated: no acupressure 
 Experimental: acupressure on the point P6 
 (Co‐intervention: antiemetic medication, dietary and activity recommendations. The acupressure group used less antiemetic medication than the two other groups).
Outcomes Nausea (Rhodes inventory of nausea and vomiting) 
 Vomiting
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear risk 'group assignments were computer generated'
Allocation concealment? Low risk 'numbered sealed envelopes'
Blinding? 
 Treatment provider High risk Not described as double‐blind (placebo/acupressure)
Blinding? 
 Outcome assessor Unclear risk Not relevant as patient reported outcome
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All outcomes Low risk Drop‐out < 15%
Free of selective reporting? Unclear risk No protocol available
Free of other bias? Low risk  
No signs of variance inequality or skewness? High risk Either variance inequality (F‐test statistically significant) or skewness (1.64 standard deviations exceeds the mean)
Trial size > 49? Low risk N = 107
Clearly concealed allocation + trial size > 49 + drop‐out max 15% Low risk All three categories fulfilled