Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 20;2010(1):CD003974. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003974.pub3

Reading 1982.

Methods Design: three group parallel trial 
 Purpose: examine the effect of preoperative interview and placebo interview on postoperative pain and recovery
Participants Patients: women undergoing elective laparoscopy 
 Baseline comparability: yes (age)
Interventions Placebo: preparation interview with neutral questions about hospitalisation in general 
 Untreated: no preparation interview 
 Experimental: preparation interview presenting 'information in a reassuring /supportive way' 
 (Co‐intervention: analgesics on demand, type and dose NS, 7 from placebo and 9 from untreated group required pain medication)
Outcomes Pain (numerical/verbal rating scale) 
 Time to return to health and work
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear risk NS
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk NS
Blinding? 
 Treatment provider High risk Not described as double‐blind (placebo/interview)
Blinding? 
 Outcome assessor Unclear risk Not relevant as patient reported outcome
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All outcomes Low risk Drop‐out < 15%
Free of selective reporting? Unclear risk No protocol available
Free of other bias? Low risk  
No signs of variance inequality or skewness? High risk Either variance inequality (F‐test statistically significant) or skewness (1.64 standard deviations exceeds the mean)
Trial size > 49? High risk N = 38
Clearly concealed allocation + trial size > 49 + drop‐out max 15% High risk Trial size < 49