Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 20;2010(1):CD003974. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003974.pub3

Roscoe 2002.

Methods Design: three period, Latin square, cross‐over trial 
 Purpose: examine the effect of acustimulation on chemotherapy‐induced nausea
Participants Patients: cancer patients receiving chemotherapy who previously have experienced moderate or severe chemotherapy‐induced nausea
Interventions Placebo: acustimulation wrist‐band without stimulation of point PC‐6 
 Untreated: no acustimulation write band 
 Experimental: acustimulation wrist band with stimulation on point PC‐6 
 (Co‐intervention: 'antiemetic pills')
Outcomes Antiemetic use (pills per day) 
 Nausea 
 Acute nausea 
 Delayed nausea
Notes The outcome data was not available from the first period only, and was calculated as deriving from a parallel group trial.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear risk NS
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk NS
Blinding? 
 Treatment provider Unclear risk NS
Blinding? 
 Outcome assessor Unclear risk Not relevant as patient reported outcome
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All outcomes High risk Drop‐out > 15% or NS
Free of selective reporting? Unclear risk No protocol available
Free of other bias? Unclear risk The outcome data from this cross‐over trial was not available from the first period only, and was calculated as deriving from a parallel group trial.
No signs of variance inequality or skewness? Low risk No variance inequality (F‐test not statistically significant) and no skewness (1.64 standard deviations does not exceed the mean)
Trial size > 49? Low risk N = 54
Clearly concealed allocation + trial size > 49 + drop‐out max 15% High risk Drop‐out > 15% or NS