Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 20;2010(1):CD003974. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003974.pub3

Sanders 1990.

Methods Design: three group parallel trial 
 Purpose: examine the effect of chiropractic spinal manipulation on acute low back pain
Participants Patients: out‐patients with acute low back pain 
 Baseline comparability: no, stratified for sex
Interventions Placebo: light physical touch by investigator at L4/L5‐S1 region 
 Untreated: no touch or manipulation 
 Experimental: low amplitude high velocity manipulation of L4/L5‐S1 region 
 (Co‐intervention: no)
Outcomes Pain (5‐point NRS) 
 Plasma B‐endorphin concentration
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Low risk 'table of random numbers'
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk NS
Blinding? 
 Treatment provider High risk Not described as double‐blind (placebo/ manipulation)
Blinding? 
 Outcome assessor Unclear risk Not relevant as patient reported outcome
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All outcomes Low risk Drop‐out < 15%
Free of selective reporting? Unclear risk No protocol available
Free of other bias? Low risk  
No signs of variance inequality or skewness? Low risk No variance inequality (F‐test not statistically significant) and no skewness (1.64 standard deviations does not exceed the mean)
Trial size > 49? High risk N = 12
Clearly concealed allocation + trial size > 49 + drop‐out max 15% High risk Trial size < 49