Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 20;2010(1):CD003974. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003974.pub3

Stewart 1991.

Methods Design: four group parallel trial 
 Purpose: examine the effect of cognitive‐behavioural therapy on oral hygiene
Participants Patients: veteran out‐patients with normal oral hygiene 
 Baseline comparability: yes
Interventions Placebo: sessions of lectures on non‐disease aspects of dentistry 
 Untreated: no sessions 
 Experimental: sessions of cognitive‐behavioural therapy 
 (Co‐intervention: NS)
Outcomes Brushing frequency (per week) and Plaque Index 
 Flossing frequency
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear risk NS
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk NS
Blinding? 
 Treatment provider High risk Not described as double‐blind (placebo/cognitive‐behavioural therapy)
Blinding? 
 Outcome assessor Low risk 'The dentist that rated plaque levels was blind to each subject's assigned experimental group'
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All outcomes High risk Drop‐out > 15% or NS
Free of selective reporting? Unclear risk No protocol available
Free of other bias? Low risk  
No signs of variance inequality or skewness? Low risk No variance inequality (F‐test not statistically significant) and no skewness (1.64 standard deviations does not exceed the mean)
Trial size > 49? Low risk N = 50
Clearly concealed allocation + trial size > 49 + drop‐out max 15% High risk Drop‐out > 15% or NS