Sumaya 2001.
| Methods | Design: three group, three period, cross‐over trial Purpose: examine the effect of bright light treatment on depression in institutionalised older adults | |
| Participants | Patients: institutionalised older adults with moderate to severe depression (baseline scores on the Geriatric Depression Scale 11 to 20) Baseline comparability: not relevant |
|
| Interventions | Placebo: sessions with light treatment with 300 Lux for 30 minutes per day for 1 week Untreated: no light treatment Experimental: light treatment with 10,000 Lux (Co‐intervention: NS) | |
| Outcomes | Geriatric Depression Scale at day 5 of each treatment period | |
| Notes | The outcome data was not available from the first period only, and was calculated as deriving from a parallel group trial. | |
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Adequate sequence generation? | Unclear risk | NS |
| Allocation concealment? | Unclear risk | NS |
| Blinding? Treatment provider | Unclear risk | NS |
| Blinding? Outcome assessor | Unclear risk | NS |
| Incomplete outcome data addressed? All outcomes | Low risk | Drop‐out < 15% |
| Free of selective reporting? | Unclear risk | No protocol available |
| Free of other bias? | Unclear risk | The outcome data from this cross‐over trial was not available from the first period only, and was calculated as deriving from a parallel group trial. |
| No signs of variance inequality or skewness? | Low risk | No variance inequality (F‐test not statistically significant) and no skewness (1.64 standard deviations does not exceed the mean) |
| Trial size > 49? | High risk | N = 20 |
| Clearly concealed allocation + trial size > 49 + drop‐out max 15% | High risk | Trial size < 49 |