Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 20;2010(1):CD003974. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003974.pub3

Thomas 2002b.

Methods Same trial as Thomas 2002a, but results are presented as two subanalyses because there was one group of patients randomised to placebo or no treatment (see above), and another group randomised to telephone contact, exercise and placebo versus telephone contact and exercise.
Participants See Thomas 2002a
Interventions Placebo: dolomite (calcium and magnesium) twice weekly for two years 
 Untreated: no tablets 
 Experimental: see Thomas 2002a 
 (Co‐intervention: exercise and telephone contact)
Outcomes See Thomas 2002a
Notes See Thomas 2002a
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Low risk 'computer generated lists in permuted blocks of 10, stratified by sex and age'
Blinding? 
 Treatment provider High risk Not described as double‐blind (home based exercise/placebo)
Blinding? 
 Outcome assessor Unclear risk Patient reported outcome (interviewer was blinded)
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All outcomes High risk  
Free of selective reporting? High risk No protocol available. Results not presented for placebo and no‐treatment, but authors provided additional data.
Free of other bias? Low risk  
No signs of variance inequality or skewness? Unclear risk Not relevant (not naturally positive continuous outcomes e.g. change)
Trial size > 49? Low risk N = 233
Clearly concealed allocation + trial size > 49 + drop‐out max 15% High risk