Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 20;2010(1):CD003974. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003974.pub3

Turner 1979.

Methods Design: five group parallel trial 
 Purpose: examine the effect of paradoxical intention therapy on insomnia
Participants Patients: out‐patients suffering from insomnia 
 Baseline comparability: yes (sleep parameters)
Interventions Placebo: sessions of 'quasi‐desensitization' (neutral images paired with bedtime activity) 
 Untreated: no sessions (waiting list) 
 Experimental: sessions of 
 ‐paradoxical intention therapy: instructions to remain awake as long as possible and presented with the true theoretical background 
 ‐stimulus control: practical advice on bed time activities 
 ‐progressive relaxation: training in relaxation techniques 
 (Co‐intervention: hypnotics, comparable doses between groups)
Outcomes Sleep latency (min) 
 Returning to sleep difficulty 
 Restedness rating 
 Falling asleep difficulty 
 Hours of sleep 
 Drug usage per week
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Blinding? 
 Treatment provider High risk Not described as double‐blind (placebo/paradoxical intention)
Blinding? 
 Outcome assessor Unclear risk Not relevant as patient reported outcome
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All outcomes High risk  
Free of selective reporting? Unclear risk No protocol available
Free of other bias? Low risk  
No signs of variance inequality or skewness? High risk Either variance inequality (F‐test statistically significant) or skewness (1.64 standard deviations exceeds the mean)
Trial size > 49? High risk N = 20
Clearly concealed allocation + trial size > 49 + drop‐out max 15% High risk Trial size < 49