Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 20;2010(1):CD003974. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003974.pub3

Camatte 1969.

Methods Design: ten group parallel trial 
 Purpose: examine the effect of various forms of drugs and placebo on the pain associated with peptic ulcer disease
Participants Patients: patients with radiologically confirmed gastric ulcers 
 Baseline comparability: NS
Interventions Placebo: patches without active substance 
 Untreated: no patches, capsules or injections 
 Experimental: patches, capsules, and injections with various drugs, e.g. bismuth 
 (Co‐intervention: NS)
Outcomes Pain (number of days in pain)
Notes Outcome not reported so that meta‐analysis is possible.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear risk NS
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk NS
Blinding? 
 Treatment provider Low risk 'Nei Gruppi 2 e 10 il placebo veniva presentato sotto forma di compresse aventi il medesimo aspetto ed il medesimo colore di uno dei medicamenti impiegati nei Gruppi 3 e 9'
Blinding? 
 Outcome assessor Unclear risk Not relevant as patient reported outcome
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All outcomes High risk Drop‐out > 15% or NS
Free of selective reporting? High risk Outcome not reported so that meta‐analysis is possible.
Free of other bias? Low risk  
Trial size > 49? Low risk N = 72
Clearly concealed allocation + trial size > 49 + drop‐out max 15% High risk Drop‐out > 15% or NS