Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 20;2010(1):CD003974. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003974.pub3

Cesarone 2001.

Methods Design: three group parallel trial 
 Purpose: to evaluate the effect of local (foot) treatment with Essaven gel in subjects with diabetes mellitus and neuropathy without ulcers.
Participants Patients: out‐patients with diabetes mellitus and neuropathy without ulcers. 
 Baseline comparability: NS
Interventions Placebo: Placebo‐gel 
 Untreated: No‐treatment 
 Experimental: 1g of Essaven gel applied to foot 
 (Co‐intervention: Standard insulin management)
Outcomes Laser Doppler flowmetry measuring flux 
 PO2/PCO2 (Kontron analyzer with a Combi sensor)
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear risk NS
Allocation concealment? Low risk 'the randomization process was controlled by an external statistical controller according to GCP rules'
Blinding? 
 Treatment provider Low risk 'The trial was a double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study'
Blinding? 
 Outcome assessor Low risk Objective measurements of flux and PO2/PCO2
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All outcomes High risk Drop‐out > 15% or NS
Free of selective reporting? Unclear risk No protocol available
Free of other bias? Low risk  
Trial size > 49? High risk N = 23
Clearly concealed allocation + trial size > 49 + drop‐out max 15% High risk Trial size < 49