Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 20;2010(1):CD003974. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003974.pub3

Crosby 1994.

Methods Design: four group parallel trial 
 Purpose: examine the effect of iron supplement on acute blood loss anaemia after surgery
Participants Patients: postoperative out‐patients 
 Baseline comparability: yes for age and sex.
Interventions Placebo: NS 
 Untreated: no placebo or iron 
 Experimental: iron supplement at two doses 
 (Co‐intervention: no)
Outcomes Hb concentration (mg Hgl/dl) (59 days after surgery) 
 Haematocrit 
 Serum‐iron 
 Serum‐ferritin
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear risk 'computer‐generated table of random numbers'
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk NS
Blinding? 
 Treatment provider Low risk 'Consenting patients were randomized into four groups in a double‐blind fashion...'
Blinding? 
 Outcome assessor Unclear risk NS
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All outcomes Low risk Drop‐out < 15%
Free of selective reporting? Unclear risk No protocol available
Free of other bias? Low risk  
No signs of variance inequality or skewness? Low risk No variance inequality (F‐test not statistically significant) and no skewness (1.64 standard deviations does not exceed the mean)
Trial size > 49? Low risk N = 59
Clearly concealed allocation + trial size > 49 + drop‐out max 15% High risk Allocation not clearly concealed