Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 20;2010(1):CD003974. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003974.pub3

Davidson 1980.

Methods Design: five group parallel trial 
 Purpose: examine the effect of psychological treatments on compulsive nail biting
Participants Patients: out‐patients regarding nail biting a serious problem and a source of personal shame 
 Baseline comparability: yes
Interventions Placebo: factual information on nails, diseases of nails and of theories about pathological nail biting 
 Untreated: waiting list 
 Experimental: two types of psychological intervention separately, and one combined. 
 (Co‐intervention: NS)
Outcomes Length of nails (mm) and estimated frequency of nail biting (per day) 
 Estimated control over nail biting 
 Cosmetic appearance rate
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear risk NS
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk NS
Blinding? 
 Treatment provider High risk Not described as double‐blind (placebo/psychological intervention)
Blinding? 
 Outcome assessor Low risk 'Post‐test and follow‐up sessions were conducted by an experimenter who had no knowledge of the groups to which subjects had been assigned during treatment'
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All outcomes High risk Drop‐out > 15% or NS
Free of selective reporting? Unclear risk No protocol available
Free of other bias? Low risk  
No signs of variance inequality or skewness? Low risk No variance inequality (F‐test not statistically significant) and no skewness (1.64 standard deviations does not exceed the mean)
Trial size > 49? High risk N = 20
Clearly concealed allocation + trial size > 49 + drop‐out max 15% High risk Trial size < 49