Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 20;2010(1):CD003974. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003974.pub3

Erdogmus 2007.

Methods Design: three group parallel trial 
 Purpose: study the effect of physiotherapy
Participants Out‐patients having had a disc herniation operation 
 Baseline comparability: yes (except for body mass index)
Interventions Placebo: sessions with neck massage 
 Untreated: no sessions 
 Experimental: sessions with physiotherapy‐based rehabilitation 
 (Co‐intervention: yes)
Outcomes Low Back Pain Rating Scale 
 Overall satisfaction 
 Socioeconomic parameters 
 State Trait Anxiety Inventory
Notes SDs were obtained from the reported CIs
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Low risk ‘block randomization (SAS) was performed by the Department of Medical Statistics’
Allocation concealment? Low risk 'sequentially numbered, sealed opaque envelopes'
Blinding? 
 Treatment provider High risk Not described as double‐blind (placebo/physiotherapy)
Blinding? 
 Outcome assessor Unclear risk Not relevant as patient reported outcome
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All outcomes Low risk Drop‐out < 15%
Free of selective reporting? Unclear risk No protocol available
Free of other bias? Low risk  
No signs of variance inequality or skewness? Unclear risk Not relevant (not naturally positive continuous outcomes e.g. change)
Trial size > 49? Low risk N = 80
Clearly concealed allocation + trial size > 49 + drop‐out max 15% Low risk All three categories fulfilled