Skip to main content
. 2016 May 6;2016(5):CD008914. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008914.pub3

Pessaux 2011.

Methods Randomized clinical trial (registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov, ID# NCT01068886)
 Allocation sequence: central random numbers
 Allocation concealment: sealed envelopes. We considered both allocation sequence generation and allocation concealment to be adequate.
 Blinding: not mentioned
Follow‐up: adequate. All participants were reviewed 6 weeks after operation to complete the follow‐up.
Dropouts: n = 0
Informed consent: reported
Intention‐to‐treat analysis: used
Sample size calculation: not performed
Participants Country: Strasbourg, France
Multicenter, between January 2006 and March 2009
No. randomized: 158
Age: No‐stent group: 60.6 ± 11.8 years; Stent group: 60.8 ± 11.8 years
Gender: Male/Female: 86/72
 Inclusion criteria: Participants underwent conventional or pylorus‐preserving PD
Exclusion criteria: Age less than 18 years, emergency surgery
Definition of pancreatic fistula: ISGPF
Conflicts of interest: No potential conflicts of interest
Interventions 158 participants who underwent PD were randomized intraoperatively to either receive an external stent inserted across the anastomosis to drain the pancreatic duct (n = 77) or no stent (n = 81)
Outcomes The main outcome measures were:
Pancreatic fistula
Overall morbidity rate
Mortality rate
Length of hospitalization
Notes None
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Central random numbers
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Sealed envelopes
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not mentioned
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not mentioned
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not mentioned
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Reported
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk According to the detailed outcomes
Other bias Unclear risk None detailed