Pessaux 2011.
Methods | Randomized clinical trial (registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov, ID# NCT01068886)
Allocation sequence: central random numbers
Allocation concealment: sealed envelopes. We considered both allocation sequence generation and allocation concealment to be adequate.
Blinding: not mentioned Follow‐up: adequate. All participants were reviewed 6 weeks after operation to complete the follow‐up. Dropouts: n = 0 Informed consent: reported Intention‐to‐treat analysis: used Sample size calculation: not performed |
|
Participants | Country: Strasbourg, France Multicenter, between January 2006 and March 2009 No. randomized: 158 Age: No‐stent group: 60.6 ± 11.8 years; Stent group: 60.8 ± 11.8 years Gender: Male/Female: 86/72 Inclusion criteria: Participants underwent conventional or pylorus‐preserving PD Exclusion criteria: Age less than 18 years, emergency surgery Definition of pancreatic fistula: ISGPF Conflicts of interest: No potential conflicts of interest |
|
Interventions | 158 participants who underwent PD were randomized intraoperatively to either receive an external stent inserted across the anastomosis to drain the pancreatic duct (n = 77) or no stent (n = 81) | |
Outcomes | The main outcome measures were: Pancreatic fistula Overall morbidity rate Mortality rate Length of hospitalization |
|
Notes | None | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Central random numbers |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Sealed envelopes |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not mentioned |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not mentioned |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not mentioned |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Reported |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | According to the detailed outcomes |
Other bias | Unclear risk | None detailed |