Skip to main content
. 2016 May 6;2016(5):CD008914. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008914.pub3

Tani 2010.

Methods A prospective randomized clinical trial (registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov, ID# NCT00628186)
Allocation sequence: adequate
Allocation concealment: adequate, used CONSORT flow diagram. We considered both allocation sequence generation and allocation concealment to be adequate.
Blinding: no mention
Follow‐up: adequate
Dropouts: n = 0
Informed consent: reported
Intention‐to‐treat analysis: used
 Sample size calculation: performed
Participants Country: Japan
Single center: Wakayama Medical University Hospital, between April 2005 and August 2007. No. randomized: 100
Age: 35 to 87 years
Gender: Male/Female: 55/45
 Inclusion criteria: Underwent PD for pancreatic head and periampullary disease.
Exclusion criteria: Severe associated diseases that might prolong hospital stay. Condition inadequately diagnosed for this trial by a physician. Could not have a pancreatic stent placed
Definition of pancreatic fistula: ISGPF
Conflicts of interest: none
Interventions 100 participants who underwent PD were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups:
 Group 1: External drainage (n = 50)
 Group 2: Internal drainage (n = 50)
Outcomes The main outcome measures were:
Postoperative hospital stay
Mortality and morbidity
Pancreatic fistula
Delayed gastric emptying
Intra‐abdominal hemorrhage
Intra‐abdominal abscess
Notes One participant in group 1 died in the hospital
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Used CONSORT flow diagram
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Used CONSORT flow diagram
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not mentioned
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not mentioned
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not mentioned
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Detailed information
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk According to the outcomes reported
Other bias Unclear risk Not mentioned