Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 12;2013(9):CD003826. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003826.pub3

Comparison 3. Silicone gel versus silicone gel with different contact layers.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Scar width ‐ prevention 1 238 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.80 [‐0.01, 1.61]
2 Scar height ‐ prevention 1 238 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [‐0.10, 0.10]
3 Scar colour ‐ prevention 1 233 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐0.20 [‐0.78, 0.38]
4 Scar perfusion ‐ prevention 1 235 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐1.40 [‐4.25, 1.45]
5 Improvement >50% in cosmesis, itching and pain ‐ treatment 1 80 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.79 [0.65, 0.96]