Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr;145(4):1157–1164.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.12.010

Table II.

Change in symptom control ≥minimum important difference for study population (and by severity definition) where this resulted in a change in symptom control from well controlled to suboptimal (or vice versa)

Population n Improved No change Worse McNemar
P value
Complete cohort
All ages 319 28 (9) 254 (80) 37 (12) .26
 2-4 y 60 3 (5) 49 (82) 8 (13) .13
 5+ y 259 25 (10) 205 (79) 29 (11) .59
“Persistent poor control”
All ages 147 12 (8) 118 (80) 17 (12) .35
 2-4 y 45 3 (7) 37 (82) 5 (11) .48
 5+ y 102 9 (9) 81 (79) 12 (12) .51
High-dose ICS
All ages 127 8 (6) 106 (83) 13 (10) .26
 2-4 y 33 2 (6) 29 (88) 2 (6) 1.00
 5+ y 94 6 (6) 77 (82) 11 (12) .23
“Difficult asthma”
All ages 90 7 (8) 79 (88) 4 (4) .37
 2-4 y 37 3 (8) 30 (81) 4 (11) .71
 5+ y 53 4 (8) 49 (92) 0 (0) .05

Values are n (%).

This severity definition is partially dependent on the (c)ACT score, so this P value may be influenced by regression to the mean.