Skip to main content
. 2008 Oct 8;2008(4):CD003823. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003823.pub2

Trevisan 1995.

Methods No minimal BP inclusion criteria; 24‐week total double‐blind treatment, report BP at week 4 of double‐blind treatment
Participants All patients (normotensive and hypertensive) with non‐insulin‐dependent diabetes mellitus: 
 Ramipril 1.25 mg: n=60(44 males,16 females); mean age=56(7) years; baseline SBP=147(15) mm Hg, DBP=90(6) mm Hg; 
 Placebo: n=62(50 males,12 females); mean age=58(7) years; baseline SBP=151(14) mm Hg, DBP=91(6) mm Hg; 
 Subgroup of patients with BP >/= 160/95 mm Hg: 
 Ramipril 1.25 mg: n=19; baseline SBP=156(12) mm Hg, DBP=95(4) mm Hg; 
 Placebo: n=24; baseline SBP=161(9) mm Hg, DBP=95(3) mm Hg
Interventions Ramipil 1.25 mg once daily; 
 Placebo
Outcomes Mean change from baseline in sitting SBP/DBP using mercury sphygmomanometer; 
 WDAE
Notes Used week 4 BP data only; no minimal BP inclusion criteria, trial included both hypertensive and non‐hypertensive patients; Used BP data from subgroup with BP >/= 160/95 mm Hg; BP change and SD of change not reported; endpoint BP and SD reported; imputed endpoint SD of change; BP data from Table 5, p. 881; time of BP measurement not reported; Jadad score=4; funding source= Hoechst
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear