Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 24;112(4):400–409. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djz131

Table 2.

Performance measures and adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) among women age 50–74 years screened within the Ontario Breast Screening Program between 2011 and 2014 by screening recommendation (n = 980 859 screens)

 Performance measure Biennial recommendation (n = 733 637) (Referent)
Annual recommendation by reason
Family or personal history* (n = 157 425)
Mammographic density 75% (n = 83 192)
Family or personal history* + mammographic density 75% (n = 6605)
No. (screens) Rate (95% CI) No. (screens) Rate (95% CI) OR (95% CI) No. (screens) Rate (95% CI) OR (95% CI) No. (screens) Rate (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
Abnormal recall rate, % 52 690 8.3 9863 8.4 1.01 6228 9.4 1.14 466 9.1 1.10
(733 637) (7.6 to 9.1) (157 425) (7.6 to 9.2) (0.97 to 1.04) (83 192) (8.4 to 10.6) (1.05 to 1.25) (6605) (7.8 to 10.6) (0.97 to 1.26)
Nonmalignant biopsy rate per 1000 4017 6.4 759 7.1 1.10 579 9.7 1.51 44 9.8 1.52
(733 637) (5.4 to 7.7) (157 425) (5.9 to 8.5) (1.01 to 1.21) | (83 192) (7.9 to 11.9) (1.32 to 1.73)** (6605) (7.0 to 13.6) (1.14 to 2.04)‡‡
Positive predictive value, % 3987 7.8 752 8.3 1.07 354 7.5 0.96 56 15.5 2.17
(52 690) (6.8 to 8.8) (9863) (7.1 to 9.6) (0.98 to 1.17) (6228) (6.2 to 8.9) (0.81 to 1.13) (466) (11.5 to 20.4) (1.55 to 3.04)**
Cancer detection rate per 1000 3987 6.5 752 7.0 1.07 354 7.0 1.08 56 14.1 2.17
(733 637) (5.8 to 7.3) (157 425) (6.1 to 8.0) (0.98 to 1.17) (83 192) (6.0 to 8.2) (0.93 to 1.24) (6605) (10.4 to 19.0) (1.61 to 2.94)**
 Breast cancer type,
  Invasive 3280 5.4 617 5.6 1.05 262 5.2 0.98 39 9.7 1.83
(732 927) (4.7 to 6.1) (157 290) (4.9 to 6.5) (0.95 to 1.16) (83 100) (4.4 to 6.2) (0.84 to 1.14) (6588) (6.6 to 14.3) (1.25 to 2.67)§§
  DCIS 681 1.1 131 1.2 1.17 87 1.6 1.49 17 4.2 3.93
(730 328) (0.9 to 1.3) (156 804) (0.9 to 1.7) (0.96 to 1.42) (82 925) (1.1 to 2.2) (1.11 to 1.99)†† (6566) (2.5 to 4.9) (2.42 to 6.39)**
 Age at screen, y
  50–59 1078 4.7 161 4.8 1.02 183 5.8 1.22 21 9.8 2.09
(290 830) (4.1 to 5.5) (53 796) (3.8 to 6.0) (0.84 to 1.23) (50 715) (4.5 to 7.4) (0.98 to 1.53) (3549) (6.4 to 15.0) (1.38 to 3.14)**
  60–74 2909 9.9 591 10.8 1.09 171 9.7 0.97 35 22.1 2.25
(442 807) (7.4 to 13.2) (103 629) (8.1 to 14.3) (0.98 to 1.21) (32 477) (7.0 to 13.3) (0.82 to 1.16) (3056) (14.8 to 32.9) (1.53 to 3.32)**
 Menopausal status§
  Premenopausal 175 4.9 27 6.7 1.27 59 6.9 1.30 4 7.9 1.49
(35 650) (3.6 to 7.8) (4521) (3.7 to 12.4) (0.77 to 2.11) (10 502) (4.3 to 11.1) (0.89 to 1.90) (579) (2.9 to 21.3) (0.56 to 3.98)
  Postmenopausal 3737 5.1 717 5.5 1.07 284 5.3 1.03 52 11.3 2.23
(689 743) (4.7 to 5.6) (151 737) (4.9 to 6.1) (0.97 to 1.18) (72 025) (4.5 to 6.2) (0.89 to 1.19) (5965) (8.3 to 15.5) (1.63 to 3.06)**
*

Two or more first-degree female relatives with breast cancer at any age, one first-degree female relative with breast cancer younger than 50 years, one first-degree male relative with breast cancer at any age, a personal history of ovarian cancer, or one first-degree female relative with ovarian cancer at any age. DCIS = ductal carcinoma in situ.

Adjusted for age at screen, year of screen, menopausal status, use of estrogen therapy at last screen, community status, time (days) between previous and index rescreen date, and clustering by screening center attended.

Thirty-eight cancers with missing morphology excluded (29 biennial; 4 family or personal history; 5 mammographic density ≥75%).

§

Adjusted for age at screen, year of screen, use of estrogen therapy at last screen, community status, time (days) between previous and index rescreen date, and clustering by screening center attended.

|

Compared with biennial P = .04.

P = .003

**

P < .001

††

P = .007

‡‡

P = .005

§§

P = .002. All P values (two-sided) were calculated using logistic regression with generalized estimating equation models.