Table 3.
Changes in the tensile strengths and elongations for the latex gloves in percentages.
| Tensile Strength |
Elongation |
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brand Code | ABHRa | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| A | e | 9.4 | 2.1 | 2.7 | 9.9 | 0.8 | −3.1 | 3.2 | 0.8 | 3.0 | 3.2 | 2.5 | 2.2 |
| i | −4.4 | −8.9 | −16.4 | −16.4 | −30.4 | −32.3 | 0.7 | −0.7 | −3.3 | −3.3 | −10.3 | −11.9 | |
| B | e | 11.4 | 3.3 | 7.5 | 3.6 | −6.4 | −3.3 | 9.2 | 7.5 | 10.9 | 5.2 | 5.0 | 7.2 |
| i | −3.7 | −13.8 | −23.3 | −20.9 | −23.1 | −22.8 | 4.5 | 3.3 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 2.5 | 1.9 | |
| C | e | 5.8 | 1.1 | −1.8 | −0.2 | 1.9 | −0.4 | −0.1 | −0.8 | −1.5 | −1.3 | 0.1 | −1.8 |
| i | 0.3 | −1.3 | 0.2 | −2.0 | −2.8 | −10.3 | 9.8 | 8.8 | 9.0 | 8.4 | 8.6 | 0.0 | |
| D | e | 5.9 | 6.9 | 4.0 | 7.5 | 4.1 | −0.3 | 2.6 | 4.5 | 2.4 | 4.0 | 4.3 | 1.5 |
| i | 2.1 | 11.9 | 7.1 | −2.6 | 4.7 | −8.0 | 3.3 | 7.6 | 6.0 | 2.4 | 6.3 | 1.1 | |
| E | e | −5.3 | −7.5 | −10.6 | −11.7 | −17.1 | −14.4 | −0.7 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| i | −5.2 | −13.0 | −16.6 | −10.2 | −16.4 | −16.8 | 0.3 | −0.1 | −2.6 | −0.8 | −0.8 | −0.8 | |
| Mean | e | 5.4 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 1.8 | −3.3 | −4.3 | 2.8 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 2.3 | 2.5 | 2.0 |
| i | −2.2 | −5.0 | −14.0 | −10.4 | −13.6 | −18.1 | 3.7 | 3.8 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 | −2.0 | |
Note. A negative number indicates a decrease of the tensile property; while a positive number indicates an increase of the tensile property. Numbers in bold indicate that the percentage changes were statistically significantly different from zero (p < 0.05).
aLetter “e” represents ethanol-based hand rub, and letter “i” represents isopropanol-based hand rub.