Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 15;20:88. doi: 10.1186/s12890-020-1127-9

Table 2.

Asthma symptom control according to patient characteristics. Univariate logistic regression analysis was used to analyse the associations with the asthma control levels ‘Well controlled’ and ‘Uncontrolled’

Asthma symptom control Univariate logistic regression analyses
Well controlled
N (%)
Partly controlled
N (%)
Uncontrolled
N (%)
Dependent variable is
“Well controlled” asthma
Dependent variable is
“Uncontrolled” asthma
OR 95% CI P OR 95% CI P
Smoking Ex-smoker (N = 105) 42 (40.0) 47 (44.8) 16 (15.2)
Current smoker (N = 83) 23 (27.7) 34 (41.0) 26 (31.3) 0.58 0.31–1.07 0.08 2.54 1.25–5.14 0.01
Pack-years < 30 (N = 133) 47 (35.3) 61 (45.9) 25 (18.8)
≥30 (N = 57) 19 (33.3) 20 (35.1) 18 (31.6) 0.91 0.47–1.76 0.79 1.99 0.98–4.05 0.06
Sex Female (N = 112) 36 (32.1) 46 (41.1) 30 (26.8)
Male (N = 78) 30 (38.5) 35 (44.9) 13 (16.7) 1.32 0.72–2.41 0.37 0.55 0.26–1.13 0.10
Exacerbationa No (N = 139) 59 (42.4) 54 (38.8) 26 (18.7)
Yes (N = 51) 7 (13.7) 27 (52.9) 17 (33.3) 0.22 0.09–0.51 0.001 2.17 1.06–4.47 0.04
ICS No (N = 11) 3 (27.3) 4 (36.4) 4 (36.4)
Yes (N = 179) 63 (35.2) 77 (43.0) 39 (21.8) 1.45 0.37–5.65 0.59 0.49 0.14–1.75 0.49
ICS + LABA No (N = 68) 24 (35.3) 25 (36.8) 19 (27.9)
Yes (N = 122) 42 (34.4) 56 (45.9) 24 (19.7) 0.96 0.52–1.79 0.90 0.63 0.32–1.26 0.19
FEV1/FVC < 0.70b No(N = 138) 49 (35.5) 59 (42.8) 30 (21.7)
Yes (N = 52) 17 (32.7) 22 (42.3) 13 (25.0) 0.88 0.45–1.73 0.72 1.20 0.57–2.53 0.63
FEV1, % of predicted ≥ 80% 40 (39.6) 44 (43.6) 17 (16.8)
<  80% 26 (29.2) 37 (41.6) 26 (29.2) 0.63 0.34–1.15 0.13 2.04 1.02–4.08 0.04
Significant reversibilityc No (N = 173) 61 (35.3) 76 (43.9) 36 (20.8)
Yes (N = 17) 5 (29.4) 5 (29.4) 7 (41.2) 0.77 0.26–2.27 0.63 2.66 0.95–7.49 0.06

ahospitalization and/or oral corticosteroids for asthma during the previous year, bpost-bronchodilator, cchange in FEV1 at least 12% and 200 ml