Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 15;19:90. doi: 10.1186/s12934-020-01348-7

Table 2.

Multivariate analysis between clinical signs and gut microbial classes

Dry eye signs Class p Comparison with the literature
DEQ5 Methanobacteriaceae < 0.01 ↑ in RA and ulcerative Colitis [18]
Bifidobacteriaceae < 0.01
Eggerthellaceae 0.012 ↓ in myasthenia gravis [19]
Flavobacteriaceae < 0.01 ↓ in myasthenia gravis [19]
Eubacteriaceae <0.01 ↑ in type 1 diabetes [20]
Peptococcaceae < 0.01 ↓ in SLE [21]
Ruminococcaceae < 0.01 ↓ in IBD and psoriasis [22]
Erysipelotrichaceae < 0.01
Leptotrichiaceae < 0.01
Synergistaceae < 0.01
MMPWorse Porphyromonadaceae 0.042 ↑ in ankylosing spondylitis [23]
Acidaminococcaceae < 0.01
OSDI Rikenellaceae 0.046 ↑ in ankylosing spondylitis [23]
Schirmer Elusimicrobiaceae < 0.01
Carnobacteriaceae < 0.01
Clostridiaceae < 0.01 ↑ in SLE
Clostridia Family XI < 0.01 ↑ in RA and IBD-arthritis [24]
Clostridia Family XIII < 0.01
Fusobacteriaceae < 0.01 ↑ IBD [21]
Leptotrichiaceae < 0.01
Akkermansiaceae < 0.01
Stainworse Methanomassiliicoccaceae 0.028
Pasteurellaceae < 0.01 ↑ in myasthenia gravis [19]

DEQ5 dry eye questionnaire 5, OSDI ocular surface disease Index, RA Rheumatoid arthritis, IBD inflammatory bowel disease, SLE systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Multivariable analysis considered the effects of demographics (age, gender, race, ethnicity). Dry eye signs not listed in table (e.g. tear break up time) did not exhibit significant associations with gut microbial classes, when considering demographics

*For all dry eye signs, value from more severely affected eye used in the analysis