Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 15;2020(4):CD011621. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011621.pub4

Comparison 12. Doffing with double gloves versus doffing with single gloves.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
12.1 Contamination: virus detected 2   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
12.1.1 All body parts 2 58 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.34 [0.17, 0.66]
12.1.2 Face 2 58 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 4.39 [0.53, 36.37]
12.1.3 Shirt 2 58 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.01 [0.79, 1.29]
12.1.4 Pants 1 36 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.91 [0.52, 1.58]
12.2 Contamination: virus quantity 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
12.2.1 Dominant hand 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
12.2.2 Non‐dominant hand 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
12.2.3 Face 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
12.2.4 Shirt 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
12.2.5 Pants 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
12.3 Non‐compliance: any error 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
12.4 Contamination with fluorescent 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected