Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 15;2020(4):CD011621. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011621.pub4

Comparison 16. Donning and doffing with instructions versus without instructions.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
16.1 People with one or more errors 1 120 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.31 [0.11, 0.93]
16.1.1 Basic PPE 1 60 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.15 [0.04, 0.62]
16.1.2 Enhanced PPE 1 60 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.47 [0.22, 0.98]
16.2 Non‐compliance: mean errors 1 120 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.89 [‐1.36, ‐0.41]
16.2.1 Basic PPE 1 60 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.70 [‐1.15, ‐0.25]
16.2.2 Enhanced PPE 1 60 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐1.20 [‐1.87, ‐0.53]
16.3 Fluorescence contamination 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected