Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 15;2020(4):CD011621. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011621.pub4
Study Reason for exclusion
Abrahamson 2006 Uncontrolled study; 1 type of training only
Abualenain 2018 No comparison group
Alraddadi 2016 No comparison group
Anderson 2017 No highly infectious disease exposure
Beam 2011 No control group with an active intervention
Beam 2014 Uncontrolled study; only 1 type of training in donning and doffing studied with video recordings
Beam 2016a Not an empirical study
Beam 2016b Not an empirical study
Bearman 2007 Trial of universal gloving, not as part of full‐body PPE
Bischoff 2019 No highly infectious disease exposure
Borchert 2007 Description of use of PPE in MHF outbreak, not a case‐control or cohort study
Bosc 2016 Wrong comparator
Buianov 1991 Study compares 2 types of PPE for highly infectious diseases but does not measure contamination or infection as outcome, only physiological parameters (native speaker assessment AP)
Butt 2016 Wrong comparator
Casanova 2008 Not a comparative study; only studied 1 method of doffing
Casanova 2018 No comparison group
Castle 2009 Outcome only performance with PPE and not infection rate or adherence
Chandramohan 2018 No comparison group
Christian 2004 Investigation of cluster of SARS infected HCW; not a case‐control or cohort study
Chughtai 2013 Overview focusing on mask use only, not part of full‐body PPE
Clay 2015 Simulation study; military HCWs; no control group
Coates 2000 Outcome performance only not infection rates or adherence
Coca 2015 Wrong type of participants, thermal manikin study
Coca 2017 Secondary outcomes only
Colebunders 2004 Description of MHF outbreak; not a case‐control or cohort study
Cooper 2005 Simulation study, but of facial protection only, no full‐body PPE involved
Delaney 2016 No comparison group
Doll 2017a No comparison group
Doll 2017b No comparison group
Doshi 2016 No comparison group
Drew 2016 No comparison group
DuBose 2018 Wrong study design
Dunn 2015 Case study of spread of infection in 1 hospital; used in discussion section
Elcin 2016 No comparison group
Fischer 2015 Not a primary study, literature review
Fogel 2017 Wrong study design
Foote 2017 Wrong intervention
Franklin 2016 Not an empirical study
Garibaldi 2019 Secondary outcomes only
Gozel 2013 Description of use of PPE among HCW exposed to CCHF; not case‐control or cohort study
Grélot 2015 Measurement of thermal strain, no infection or contamination or compliance measured
Grélot 2016 Measurement of thermal strain, no infection or contamination or compliance measured
Hendler 2000 PPE versus no PPE; outcome performance only
Herlihey 2016 No comparison group
Herlihey 2017 No comparison group
Hersi 2015 Not a primary study, rapid review
Ho 2003 Descriptive study of SARS outbreak and HCWs use of PPE; not a case‐control or cohort study
Ho 2004 Compares consistent versus inconsistent use of PPE, not 2 different types
Hon 2008 Evaluation of on‐line PPE training; uncontrolled study, no comparison training
Hormbrey 1996 Description of introduction of new clothing; no infection or adherence outcome
Huh 2020 No comparison group
Jacob 2018 Not empirical study
Jaffe 2019 No personal contamination outcome
Jaques 2016 Report contains no data
Jeffs 2007 Description of control of MHF outbreak; not a case‐control or cohort study
Jinadatha 2015 Wrong type of participants, investigation of disinfection on different PPE fabrics and components
Jones 2020 Not empirical study
Kahveci 2019 Participants not HCWs
Kang 2017 Wrong study design
Kang 2017a No comparison group
Kappes Ramirez 2018 Wrong outcomes
Keane 1977 Description of risk of HCW only; no evaluation of PPE safety
Kerstiens 1999 Desription of Ebola outbreak; not case‐control or cohort study
Kilinc‐Balci 2016 Not an empirical study
Kilinc‐Balci 2015 Report contains no data
Kim 2015 No control group, HCWs infected with MERS CoV
Ko 2004 Description of risk of EMT staff; no evaluation of PPE safety
Kogutt 2019 No comparison group
Kratz 2017 Report contains no data
Kwon 2016 No comparison group
Kwon 2017 No comparison group
Lai 2005 Study of SARS IgG prevalence in HCWs who did not become sick, no PPE use measured
Lai 2011 No personal contamination measured only environmental contamination
Lange 2005 Letter to the editor; not primary study
Lau 2004 Compares consistent versus inconsistent use of PPE, not 2 different types
Le 2004 Compares consistent versus inconsistent use of PPE, not 2 different types
Lee 2017 Report contains no data
Lindsley 2012 Test respiratory protection only; not part of full‐body PPE
Lindsley 2014 Tests respiratory protection only; not part of full‐body PPE
Liu 2009 Compares consistent versus inconsistent use of PPE, not 2 different types
Loeb 2004 Compares consistent versus inconsistent use of PPE, not 2 different types
Low 2005 A review of SARS and HCW; not a primary study
Lowe 2014 Description of PPE use only; no adherence or infection outcomes
Lu 2006 Comparison of viral load in patients infected outside and inside hospital; comparison is with no PPE
Lu 2020 No Intervention
Luo 2011 Simulation study of 1 Tyvek® (duPont) suit only, no comparison suit or no comparison doffing method
Ma 2004 Retrospective case‐control study about PPE for SARS, compares consistent versus inconsistent use not 2 types
Makovicka 2018 No highly infectious disease exposure
Malik 2006 Participants not exposed to highly infectious diseases
Marklund 2002 Description of Ebola patient transportation; not an intervention study
Matanock 2014 Description of risk of infection of HCW compared to general population; no evaluation of PPE
McLaws 2016 Not an empirical study
Mehtar 2015 No control group, 2 infection prevention and control training courses
Minnich 2003 Description of ambulance adaptation for transport of highly infected patients; not evaluation or intervention study
Mollura 2015 Review; EVD within radiology wards and on imaging equipment
Moore 2005 Review not intervention study
Morgan 2009 Review of adverse effects of contact precautions
Mumma 2018 No comparison group
Mumma 2019 No Intervention
Muyembe‐Tamfum 1999 Description of Ebola outbreak; not case‐control or cohort study
Nikiforuk 2017 Wrong patient population
Nishiura 2005 Compares consistent versus inconsistent use of PPE, not 2 different types
Northington 2007 No comparison group; only 1 type of education with follow‐up
Novosad 2016 No comparison group
Nyenswah 2015 Case study of EVD cluster including HCWs, but insufficient information on PPE to draw any conclusions
Ofner 2003 SARS case series only; no healthy controls; not case control or cohort study
Ofner‐Agostini 2006 SARS case series only; no healthy controls; not case control or cohort study
Ogendo 2008 Eye protection only; not part of full‐body PPE
Ong 2013 No exposure to highly infectious diseases
Park 2004 Compares consistent versus inconsistent use of PPE, not 2 different types
Parveen 2018 No comparison group
Pei 2006 Compares consistent versus inconsistent use of PPE, not 2 different types
Phan 2018 Wrong intervention
Phrampus 2016 No comparison group
Porteous 2018 No personal contamination outcome
Quinn 2018 Wrong outcomes
Ragazzoni 2015 No control group, virtual reality simulation training study
Ransjo 1979 No exposure to highly infectious diseases
Reynolds 2006 Case‐control study evaluating SARS risk in HCWs in Vietnam but no inclusion of PPE use
Rosenberg 2016 Report of publication of Tomas 2015
Russell 2015 No control group, no outcome, before/after summary card
Scales 2003 Compares consistent versus inconsistent use of PPE, not 2 different types
Schumacher 2010 Comparison is no PPE; outcome is performance time only
Scott Taylor 2017 Wrong outcomes
Seto 2003 Compares consistent versus inconsistent use of PPE, not 2 different types
Shao 2015 Not a primary study, Chinese review
Sorensen 2008 No exposure to highly infectious diseases
Su 2017 No comparison group
Suen 2017 No highly infectious disease exposure
Tartari 2015 No control group, infection control readiness checklist (from 45 countries), no outcome
Teleman 2004 Compares consistent versus inconsistent use of PPE, not 2 different types
Tomas 2015 No comparison used only description of contamination in a simulation study
Tomas 2016a Wrong intervention
Torres 2015 Not a primary study, literature review
Visnovsky 2019 No personal contamination outcome
Weber 2018 No comparison group
Weber 2019 No Intervention
West 2014 Not a primary study but a commentary
Williams 2019 No comparison group
Xi 2016 No comparison group
Yin 2004 Case‐control study of use of PPE for SARS, not comparing 2 different types of PPE
Yuan 2018 Not empirical study
Zellmer 2015 No control group, checklist for removing PPE
Zhou 2003 Follow‐up of HCWs exposed to SARS and their PPE and protection measures, not comparative study

CCHF: Crimean‐Congo haemorrhagic fever; EMT: emergency medical technician; EVD: Ebola virsu disease; HCW: healthcare worker; IgG: immunoglobulin G; MERS CoV; Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus; MHF: Marburg haemorrhagic fever; PPE: personal protective equipment; SARS: severe acute respiratory syndrome