Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 15.
Published in final edited form as: Trends Analyt Chem. 2018 Jul 5;106:37–52. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2018.06.013

Table 2.

Summary of 3D printing technologies.

Method Concept Materials X,Y,Z (μm) Pros Cons Printers
I3DP
SLS [5456]
MJM
PJM
SLS
Powder,
Metals,
Ceramics,
ABR,
PP, PA,
ABS
X:38
Y:38
Z:32
Multiple material
Rigid and smooth
Soluble supports
High porosity designs
Bio compatible
Better XY resolutions
Large library of materials
Expensive
Bulky equipment
Multijet (3D systems)
Polyjet (Stratasys)
Pro X SLS 500 (3D systems)
SLA
CLIP [19,57,58]
UDP
UVLED
Laser
DLP
CLIP
ABR,
PDMS,
Various
X:50
Y:50
Z:25
User friendly
Moderate to high speed printing
Inexpensive.
Widely used
Bio-compatible resins
Single material
Manual processing
Limited resolutions compared to i3DP
Postprint processing
Pico plus 27
Asiga
Form 2
Miicraft
Autodesk Ember
Carbon 3D
FDM [19,58] Extrusion AP, ABS,
PET, PLA,
PETG
PDMS
X:400
Y:400
Z:200
Multimaterial object
Simplicity
Inexpensive
Portable
Wide range of commercial TP
Low resolutions
Build roughness lack of transparent material
Makerbot replicator 2X
Easy 3DMaker
3D Touch
2 PP [5961] Laser SU-8 <1 μm High resolutions
Fast printing
Hallow complex microstructures
Additional curing
Proprietary material
Time consuming
Coherent Mira 900-F) EnvisionTEC
3SP [59,62] Laser ABS resins
Acrylic resins
X:100
Y:100
Z:25
Wide range of specialized materials
Low surface roughness
Durability
Large print sizes
Limited resolutions ULTRA 3SP

MJM: MultiJet Modeling; PJM: PolyJet Modeling; SLS: Selective Laser Sintering; DLP: Digital Light Process; CLIP: Continuous Liquid Interface Printing; ABR: Acrylate based resins; PP: Polypropylene; PA: Polyamide nylon; ABS: Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene; AP: Acetoxysilicone polymer; PLA: Polylactic acid; PET: Polyethylene terephthalate; PETG: Polyethylene terephthalate glycol-modified; TP: Thermoplastic.