Table 2.

 Φ‐correlations of COCKTAIL results derived from (a) the broad‐scale (BD) applied to the fine‐scale (FD) data set; (b) from the fine‐scale (FD) applied to the broad‐scale (BD) data set

Sp group	(a) Broad scale vs. fine scale		(b) Fine scale vs. broad scale		D
	Φ	Prop	Φ	Prop
ArunDioi	68.82	0.01	69.40	0.09	0.58
CallVulg	41.71	0.01	49.55	0.62	7.84
CareDava	81.78	0.01	75.74	0.09	6.04
CentScab	36.31	0.01	72.34	0.23	36.03
ConvMaja	57.94	0.01	69.28	0.37	11.34
EpipMicr	88.11	0.01	91.07	0.03	2.96
GaleLute	89.46	0.26	86.54	0.82	2.92
JuncTenu	51.14	0.01	64.23	0.92	13.09
PlanLanc	7.92	0.01	85.44	0.79	77.52
PuccDist	63.16	0.01	78.50	0.11	15.34
SeduSexa	47.88	0.01	77.05	0.13	29.17
VaccMyrt	52.39	0.26	69.13	0.92	16.74
Average	57.22	0.05	74.02	0.43

Sp group, species group; Φ, phi‐coefficient multiplied by 100; Prop, proportion of plots assigned by species groups in one data set that are correctly assigned in the other data set; D, difference in transferability of the groups across the scales (absolute difference in Φ‐values).