Skip to main content
. 2006 Jun 12;33(9):1628–1642. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01514.x

Table 4.

 Transferability calculated in truncated data sets. Φ‐correlations of COCKTAIL results derived from (a) the broad‐scale (BD) applied to the fine‐scale (FD) data set; (b) from the fine‐scale (FD) applied to the broad‐scale (BD) data set; (c) from the fine‐scale (FD) applied to the meso‐scale (MD) data set; (d) from the meso‐scale (MD) applied to the fine‐scale (FD) data set

Sp group (a) Broad scale vs. fine scale (b) Fine scale vs. broad scale D (c) Fine scale vs. meso‐scale (d) Meso‐scale vs. fine scale D
Φ Prop Φ Prop Φ Prop Φ Prop
ArunDioi 45.03 0.01 48.86 0.10 3.83 46.2 0.03 47.42 0.03 1.22
CareDava 76.21 0.01 68.95 0.09 7.26 60.87 0.02 76.21 0.01 15.34
CentScab 32.78 0.01 73.8 0.23 41.02 79.49 0.08 43.01 0.01 36.50
EpipMicr 61.80 0.01 78.48 0.04 16.68 100.0 0.01 67.73 0.01 32.30
GaleLute 100.0 0.16 100.0 0.65 0.00 100.0 0.35 100.0 0.16 0.00
Average 63.16 0.04 74.02 0.22 77.31 0.10 66.87 0.04

Sp group, species group; Φ, phi‐coefficient multiplied by 100; Prop, proportion of plots assigned by species groups in one data set that are correctly assigned in the other data set; D, difference in transferability of the groups across the scales (absolute difference in Φ‐values).