Table 2.

Effects of grazing management on the percentage of stream bank ground cover in different months from June 2009 to April 2010.

Item	Treatment†	June	Aug.	Oct.	Apr.
Bare ground, %	CSU	20.04	12.00	12.14	17.38
	CSR	4.59	4.01	0.85	4.82
	RS	12.92	5.69	4.24	6.18
	SEM‡	4.23	1.96	2.77	3.49
Vegetated ground, %	CSU	29.06	35.64	44.29	35.10
	CSR	76.60	79.62	82.10	70.02
	RS	53.61	67.78	73.22	63.86
	SEM	14.32	10.95	10.17	12.48
Cut‐bank, %	CSU	34.14	28.81	25.68	28.40
	CSR	13.22	12.69	12.69	19.48
	RS	16.52	15.91	14.77	20.62
	SEM	6.53	9.17	8.02	1.09
Depositional area, %	CSU	16.77	23.54a§	17.89a	19.12
	CSR	1.85	0.00b	0.62b	0.75
	RS	16.95	10.62ab	7.76ab	9.34
	SEM	8.08	5.00	3.37	4.74

^†CSR, continuous stocking with restricted stream access; CSU, continuous stocking with unrestricted stream access; REs, rotational grazing.

^‡Standard error of the mean (n = 6).

^§Means within a column with different letters differ (P < 0.10).