Table 4.
Frequencies and Logistic Regression Analyses Examining the Correlates of Uptake of the LDCT Scan among LDCT-Eligible Attenders
| Attenders Eligible for LDCT (n = 845) |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| LDCT Uptake [% (n)] | Unadjusted OR (95% CI) | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | |
| Overall | 91.2 (770) | — | — |
| Sex | P = 0.846 | P = 0.979 | |
| F | 91.4 (342) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| M | 91.1 (428) | 0.95 (0.59–1.54) | 1.01 (0.60–1.68) |
| Age | — | P = 0.275 | P = 0.267 |
| 0.97 (0.92–1.03) | 0.97 (0.91–1.03) | ||
| Marital status | P = 0.443 | P = 0.394 | |
| Married/cohabiting | 92.2 (320) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Single/separated/divorced/widowed | 90.7 (449) | 0.82 (0.50–1.35) | 0.79 (0.46–1.36) |
| Ethnicity | P < 0.01 | P < 0.01 | |
| White | 91.3 (642) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Asian | 53.8 (7) | 0.11 (0.04–0.34) | 0.09 (0.02–0.31) |
| Black | 92.7 (76) | 1.20 (0.50–2.88) | 1.28 (0.52–3.14) |
| Mixed | 100.0 (8) | — | — |
| Other | 97.1 (34) | — | — |
| Not stated | 100.0 (3) | — | — |
| Study-specific deprivation quintile* | P = 0.074 | P = 0.072 | |
| Quintile 1 (most deprived) | 88.2 (134) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Quintile 2 | 91.7 (154) | 1.48 (0.71–3.08) | 1.82 (0.75–3.49) |
| Quintile 3 | 95.6 (172) | 2.89 (1.22–6.85) | 2.82 (1.18–6.78) |
| Quintile 4 | 87.7 (136) | 0.96 (0.48–1.91) | 0.94 (0.46–1.91) |
| Quintile 5 (least deprived) | 92.7 (165) | 1.71 (0.81–3.61) | 1.74 (0.80–3.77) |
| Smoking status | P < 0.05 | P = 0.052 | |
| Former | 94.6 (211) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Current (incl. occasional) | 90.0 (559) | 0.51 (0.27–0.97) | 0.52 (0.27–1.01) |
| Invitation group | P = 0.177 | P = 0.075 | |
| Control | 89.7 (384) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Intervention | 92.8 (386) | 1.47 (0.91–2.40) | 0.63 (0.37–1.05) |
Definition of abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; LDCT = low-dose computed tomography; OR = odds ratio.
Missing data were excluded. Bold indicates ORs that are significant at P < 0.05.
*
2010 Index of Multiple Deprivation rank quintile with cutoffs based on distribution in LSUT sample.