Abstract
Objective To establish the cost to the Queensland dairy industry of cattle tick infestation and its control, excluding the costs incurred from control measures directed specifically at tick fever and morbidity and mortality arising from tick fever.
Study design Economic models are described that have been based on empirical data relating to liveweight and milk yield loss, and on a survey of control practices and tick infestation. The first two models were designed to estimate costs of control and losses resulting from tick infestation on a single dairy farm. The third model developed estimates of the cost of tick infestation for each of four regions within the tick‐infested area of Queensland.
Results The overall cost to the Queensland dairy industry of the cattle tick (excluding the costs associated specifically with tick fever) and based on 1998 management practices, was $4,096,000 per annum. About 49% of this cost was related to the costs of control and 51% to losses in production.
Conclusion Cattle tick infestation represents a significant impost on dairy producers in Queensland, and although the actual cost will change as deregulation results in economic changes in the industry, infestations of ticks will continue to be expensive to control.
Keywords: Cattle tick, Boophilus, economic effect
References
- 1. Bureau of Agricultural Economics . The economic impact of cattle tick in Australia. AGPS, Canberra , 1959. [Google Scholar]
- 2. Cattle Tick Control Commission . Cattle tick in Australia ‐ Cattle Tick Control Commission Inquiry ‐ Report. AGPS, Canberra , 1973. [Google Scholar]
- 3. McLeod RS, Boreham PFL. Costs of major parasites to the Australian livestock industries. Int J Parasitol.1995;25:1363–1367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Sing NC, Johnston LAY, Leatch G. The economics of cattle tick control in dry tropical Australia. Aust Vet J.1983;60:37–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Mahoney DF, Ross DR. Epizootiological factors in the control of bovine babesiosis. Aust Vet J. 1972;48:292–298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Jonsson NN, Matschoss AL. Attitudes and practices of Queensland dairy farmers to the control of the cattle tick, Boophilus microplus . Aust Vet J. 1998;76:746–751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Jonsson NN, Mayer DG, Matschoss AL et al Production effects of cattle tick (Boophilus microplus) infestation of high yielding dairy cows. Vet Parasitol 1998;78:65–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Bourne AS, Sutherst RW, Sutherland ID et al Ecology of the cattle tick (Boophilus microplus) in sub‐tropical Australia. 3. Modeling populations on different breeds of cattle. Aust J Agr Res. 1988;39:309–318. [Google Scholar]
- 9. Busby G, Lake M. Queensland dairy accounting scheme handbook. Department of Primary Industries Queensland Information series QI 96005 Brisbane, 1996.
- 10. McInerney J, Kooij D. Economic analysis of alternative AD control programmes. Vet Microbiol.1997;55:113–121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]