Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 15.
Published in final edited form as: Biol Psychiatry. 2019 Oct 16;87(12):1035–1044. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.09.029

Table 2 –

Risk gene discovery in OCD

Gene # de novo LGD # de novo Mis-D # transmitted LGD # non-transmitted LGD # transmitted Mis-D # non-transmitted Mis-D p-value q-value (FDR)
SCUBE1 1 1 0 0 0 0 2.96 × 10−6 0.091

CHD8 1 1 0 0 0 0 3.57 × 10−6 0.098

TTN 0 3 1 1 9 10 0.0006 0.63

We used the TADA algorithm (He et al., 2013) to estimate the likelihood of observing gene-level recurrence of de novo damaging variants in three genes in unrelated individuals. Two of these genes, SCUBE1 and CHD8, exceeded the false discovery rate (FDR) threshold for high-confidence risk genes (q<0.1). Despite observing three de novo damaging variants in TTN, this gene did not meet criteria for a high-confidence or even a probable (q<0.3) risk gene, owing to its large size and high expected de novo mutation rate. See also Figure S5, Tables S2S3, Table S5.