Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Mar 23;51(9):831–842. doi: 10.1111/apt.15685

Table 2.

Clinical Remission in Adults

Study (year) N Outcome Timepoint Results
Panaccione 201921 2207 CR (CDAI<150) 26 weeks <1 year: 57.8% (n=45)
≥1–<2 years: 35.8% (n=67)
2–≤5 years: 34.2% (n=196)
>5 years: 33.7% (n=768)
p=0.013
Ogata 201622 1693 CR (CDAI < 150) 24 weeks <2 versus 2 to <5 years: OR 0.84 (0.26–2.65) p=0.76
<2 versus 5 to <10 years: OR 0.28 (0.10–0.80) p=0.02
<2 versus 10 to <20 years: OR 0.27 (0.10–0.75) p=0.01
<2 versus >20 years: OR 0.24 (0.08–0.71) p=0.01
Schreiber 201012 425 CR (CDAI ≤ 150) 26 weeks <1 Year: 68.4% (n=19)
≥1 to <2 years: 55.0% (n=20)
≥2 to <5 years: 46.7% (n=45)
≥5 Years: 44.3% (n=131)
Faleck 201923 650 CR (complete resolution of all CD related symptoms) And CSFR (tapering off steroids completely, achieving clinical remission, and no repeat steroid prescription within 4 weeks of tapering) 26 weeks CR ≤ 2 years vs >2 years: 38% vs 23% (p<0.05)
CSFR ≤ 2 years vs >2 years: 43% vs 14% (p<0.05)
Schreiber 201311 777 CR (CDAI < 150) 26 weeks <2 years: 46% (n=56)
≥2 to <5 years: 28% (n=95)
≥5 years: 32% (n=366)
52 weeks <2 years: 43% (n=56)
≥2 to <5 years: 30% (n=95)
≥5 years: 28% (n=366)
Reinisch 200920 945 CR (HBI ≤ 4) 20 weeks <2 years: 58% (n=62/107)
2–5 years 56% (n=121/217)
>5 years 50% (n=309/621)
Colombel 201517 188 CR (CDAI < 150) and Composite Outcomes 26 weeks IFX+AZA Combination early versus non-early:
CR: 81.5% vs 80.0% p<0.05
CR+MH: 63% vs 53.3% p<0.05
CR+CRPnorm: 76.5% vs 55.6% p>0.05
CR+MH+CRPnorm: 64.7% vs 44.4% p<0.05
D’Haens 200815 129 CSFR (CDAI < 150 and absence of corticosteroid treatment, and no intestinal resection) 26 weeks Early combined immunosuppression group vs conventional management:
 •60.6% (n=39/65) vs 35.9% (n=23/64)
 •Δ=24.1% (95% CI 7.3–40.8, p=0.0062)
52 weeks Early combined immunosuppression group vs conventional management:
 •61.5% (n=40/65) vs 42.2% (n=27/64)
 •Δ=19.4% (95% CI 2.4–36.3, p=0.0278)

Study only reported odds ratios.