Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 21;30(5):2973–2983. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06595-w

Table 3.

The diagnostic performance of EM, GM, LSM, APRI, and FIB-4 in evaluate liver fibrosis stages in training and test cohort

Stage and method AUC p value * p value ** Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV (%) NPV (%) LR+ LR−
Training cohort
  S4
    APRI 0.715 (0.663–0.767) < .001 < .001 65.9 66.3 56.8 75.0 1.9 0.5
    FIB-4 0.690 (0.636–0.744) < .001 < .001 69.1 61.2 55.8 72.4 1.9 0.6
    LSM 0.926 (0.899–0.953) < .001 < .001 84.8 91.2 79.8 93.3 5.8 0.1
    GM 0.994 (0.984–0.999) / < .001 95.1 95.6 96.3 95.8 21.3 0.0
    EM 1.0 (0.992–1.0) / / 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 / 0.0
  ≥ S3
    APRI 0.778 (0.730–0.827) < .001 < .001 71.3 75.8 73.9 72.8 2.6 0.3
    FIB-4 0.745 (0.695–0.795) < .001 < .001 69.0 66.3 67.9 65.5 1.9 0.5
    LSM 0.906 (0.876–0.937) < .001 < .001 86.8 85.3 86.7 84.7 6.0 0.2
    GM 0.992 (0.981–0.997) / < .001 96.9 95.0 97.1 95.0 19.0 0.0
    EM 0.993 (0.983–0.998) / / 97.4 95.8 98.1 97.0 23.4 0.0
  ≥ S2
    APRI 0.781 (0.73–0.832) < .001 < .001 75.2 73.3 84.8 58.2 2.8 0.4
    FIB-4 0.729 (0.673–0.785) < .001 < .001 62.8 73.3 79.7 54.4 2.0 0.4
    LSM 0.906 (0.873–0.940) < .001 < .001 82.6 87.7 89.5 75.6 4.2 0.2
    GM 0.992 (0.972–1.0) / < .001 95.7 94.4 97.5 95.0 22.3 0.0
    EM 0.994 (0.981–0.998) / / 98.8 96.0 98.1 97.0 25.8 0.0
Test cohort
  S4
    APRI 0.716 (0.617–0.815) < .001 < .001 60.7 75.6 55.4 78.3 1.8 0.4
    FIB-4 0.698 (0.598–0.798) < .001 < .001 60.7 68.3 53.9 74.0 1.7 0.5
    LSM 0.884 (0.821–0.947) .003 < .001 83.6 78.0 72.7 84.5 4.0 0.3
    GM 0.897 (0.831–0.940) .002 < .001 86.0 83.6 87.8 81.3 5.2 0.2
    EM 0.921 (0.897–0.951) .01 .005 89.1 87.0 92.8 81.3 6.9 0.1
    GM + LSM 0.937 (0.907–0.970) / .013 89.0 92.5 90.2 87.3 12.1 0.1
    GM + EM 0.950 (0.917–0.972) / / 90.1 94.3 94.9 88.0 15.7 0.1
  ≥ S3
    APRI 0.741 (0.645–0.838) .001 .001 58.3 72.2 65.0 64.3 1.7 0.5
    FIB-4 0.721 (0.622–0.821) < .001 < .001 58.3 68.5 64.9 62.2 1.6 0.5
    LSM 0.898 (0.839–0.956) .004 .001 83.3 74.1 80.3 74.5 3.9 0.3
    GM 0.885 (0.827–0.919) .003 .004 87.7 84.3 92.1 76.8 5.6 0.2
    EM 0.910 (0.853–0.952) .022 .004 85.2 90.0 93.1 73.3 8.1 0.2
    GM + LSM 0.927 (0.893–0.958) / .016 87.8 85.8 90.5 78.2 8.2 0.1
    GM + EM 0.932 (0.899–0.961) / / 89.9 87.9 90.7 80.3 8.1 0.2
  ≥ S2
    APRI 0.796 (0.711–0.881) .001 < .001 63.6 73.9 81.0 53.9 2.0 0.4
    FIB-4 0.801 (0.711–0.890) .001 < .001 66.7 75.4 82.8 57.9 2.3 0.4
    LSM 0.896 (0.834–0.957) .004 .001 75.8 85.5 87.0 72.7 3.2 0.2
    GM 0.882 (0.825-0.918) .003 < .001 87.1 83.3 89.9 70.6 5.3 0.1
    EM 0.907 (0.849–0.950) .022 .007 87.9 83.2 90.2 76.0 5.5 0.2
    GM + LSM 0.920 (0.886–0.951) / .019 88.0 88.2 92.5 87.3 6.6 0.1
    GM + EM 0.930 (0.899–0.962) / / 90.0 87.8 94.2 77.6 7.2 0.1

Data in parentheses are 95% confidence intervals

*Compared with GM in training cohort and compared with GM + LSM in testing cohort

**Compared with EM in training cohort and compared with GM + EM in testing cohort

GM gray scale modality, EM elastogram modality, LSM liver stiffness measurement, GM + EM, gray scale modality and elastogram modality, GM + LSM gray scale modality and liver stiffness measurement, NPV negative predictive value, PPV positive predictive value, LR+ positive diagnostic likelihood ratio, LR− negative diagnostic likelihood ratio