Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 15;40(4):BSR20200520. doi: 10.1042/BSR20200520

Table 2. Details of quality evaluation by the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale.

Studies Representativeness of the exposed cohort Selection of the non-exposed cohort Ascertainment of exposure Outcome of interest not present at baseline Adjustment of age and gender Adjustment of other confounding factors Assessment of outcome Follow-up long enough Adequacy of follow-up of cohorts Total
Rauuncolo, 2002 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 6
Wei, 2010 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 5
Sooman, 2014 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 6
Guadagno, 2016 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 6
Pinel, 2017 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8
Tsidulko, 2017 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8
Nishikawa, 2018 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 5
Bien-Möller, 2018 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7
Alameda, 2019 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8
Hou, 2019 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7
Dong, 2019a 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7
Dong, 2019b 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7

The study Dong 2019 included stratified datasets in patients with WHO grade II–III glioma and glioblastoma, which were included in the meta-analysis separately.