Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 6;4(7):1311–1320. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019001267

Table 1.

Patient demographics

Treatment Group (N = 288) HMA + VEN (n = 28) HMA (n = 47) Intensive induction (n = 228) P
Median age, y 71 72 55 .0001
 <55 114
 55-65 2 8 89
 >65 26 (median, 72) 39 (median, 75) 25 (median, 68) .004*
Performance status
 0-1 15 (63) 23 (64) 180 (87) .0002
 2-3 9 (37) 13 (36) 27 (13)
AML subtype
 De novo 25 (89) 35 (74) 213 (93) .001
 Secondary AML 1 (4) 6 (13) 4 (2)
 Treated secondary AML 2 (7) 6 (13) 11 (5)
Risk group (ELN)
 Favorable 24 (86) 33 (70) 183 (80) .310
 Intermediate 5 (11) 12 (5)
 Adverse 4 (14) 9 (19) 33 (15)
Cytogenetics
 Diploid 23 (82) 28 (60) 173 (76) .331
 Complex 1 (4) 2 (4) 8 (4)
 +8 2 (8) 1(2) 7 (3)
 −5q
 −7q 1 (<1)
 −5/−7
 11q abnormality 1 (<1)
 Other intermediate 2 (7) 11 (23) 23 (1)
 Insufficient/not performed 5 (11) 11 (5)
 CBF (inv(16), t(8;21)) 4 (2)

Data are n or n (%) unless otherwise noted.

*

HMA + VEN vs IC.