Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 4;7(2):523–532. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12576

Table 1.

Global strain values derived from different cardiovascular magnetic resonance techniques

FT TAG SENC
GLS (%) 23.5 (22.0–25.9) 14.9 (11.8–16.9) 19.4 (17.1–20.7)
GCS (%) 26.1 (21.8–27.8) 17.8 (16.4–19.5) 20.3 (16.5–22.3)

Values are expressed as median (interquartile range). FT, feature tracking; GCS, global circumferential strain; GLS, global longitudinal strain; SENC, fast‐strain‐encoded cardiovascular magnetic resonance; TAG, myocardial tagging.