Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 17;43(4):829–838. doi: 10.1002/jssc.201900854

Table 1.

UHPSFC‐DAD assay method validation results

1 2 3 5 6 7 8
Reg. equi. y = 620.9x–2536.1 y = 677.7x–4208.4 y = 374.4x–1027.8 y = 856.0x–1071.2 y = 511.5x–835.46 y = 588.0x–6864.2 y = 464.6x + 866.24
R 2 0.9998 0.9994 0.9997 0.9999 0.9996 0.9991 0.9987
Linearitya 6.4–1030.0 6.4–1075.0 6.5–921.0 5.4–869.0 5.8–897.3 9.5–953.4 6.6–1035.0
LODb 1.0 0.8 1.3 1.1 0.8 1.6 2.0
LOQb 3.0 2.5 3.8 3.3 2.3 4.9 6.0
Precision
Intra‐dayc 1.6 1.2 1.7 1.6 2.1 1.8 1.4
Inter‐dayd 1.4 1.1 2.6 2.1 2.1 2.2 1.9
Accuracye
Low 100.2 ± 0.9 100.2 ± 2.8 101.7 ± 4.7 107.2 ± 2.6 96.9 ± 4.7
Medium 102.0 ± 2.0 100.7 ± 4.1 98.7 ± 2.5 105.3 ± 1.8 97.3 ± 1.9
High 102.5 ± 2.5 99.2 ± 1.9 98.1 ± 1.6 106.5 ± 2.3 104.2 ± 3.1
a

Linearity range from LLOQ to ULOQ in µg/mL

b

µg/mL

c

Maximum deviation within one day based on peak area in percent (n = 3 on each day)

d

Deviation within three days based on peak area in percent (n = 9)

e

Recovery values (n = 3) in percent (mean ± RSD)