Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 17;43(4):829–838. doi: 10.1002/jssc.201900854

Table 2.

Quantitative UHPSFC‐DAD and UHPLC‐DAD results for compounds 13, 5‐8 in Verbenae herba samples VO‐1 ‐ VO‐3; all values expressed in mg per g plant material (with RSD in Parentheses; n = 3)

Compound 1 2 3 5* 6 7 8
UHPSFC assay
VO‐1 3.3 (1.4) 10.5 (1.1) 1.8 (2.6) 3.0 (2.1) 2.6 (2.1) 7.6 (2.2) 7.0 (1.9)
VO‐2 2.3 (1.0) 27.6 (0.6) 1.9 (0.9) 2.3 (1.5) 5.3 (1.0) 19.4 (1.8) 11.3 (1.8)
VO‐3 4.7 (1.4) 22.1 (0.7) 2.1 (1.8) 2.7 (2.1) 4.4 (1.1) 9.4 (1.1) 9.0 (1.8)
UHPLC assay
VO‐1 3.3 (0.7) 10.6 (0.7) 1.7 (1.1) 3.8 (2.8) 2.4 (2.2) 7.8 (1.0) 7.3 (2.8)
VO‐2 2.3 (1.3) 28.1 (0.4) 2.0 (0.4) 5.1 (0.7) 5.3 (0.6) 19.5 (1.8) 11.7 (1.3)
VO‐3 4.7 (1.8) 22.9 (1.3) 2.2 (1.2) 4.1 (1.0) 4.3 (0.4) 9.8 (1.0) 9.6 (1.1)

*results of the UHPLC assay are very likely overestimated due to a possible co‐elution