Table 1.
Overview over the experimental results of knee angle for normal walking.
| Study | Subjects (mean height ± SD (m), mean weight ± SD (kg)) | Speed (m/s) | A (°) | B (°) | C (°) | D (°) | C-A (°) | ROM (°) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Collins et al. [125] | 9 (1.84 ± 0.10, 77.4 ± 9.2) | 1.25 | 12 | 3 | 61 | -5 | 49 | 66 |
| Zheng [21] | 1 (1.78, 70) | 1.2 | 22 | 10 | 66 | 6 | 44 | 60 |
| Wang [126], Lee et al. [17] | 1 (1.69, 63.5) | 1.5 | 7 | 3 | 53 | -2 | 46 | 55 |
| Mooney and Herr [22] | 6 (1.83 ± 0.06, 89 ± 8) | 1.4 | 28 | 5 | 78 | 4 | 50 | 74 |
| Shamaei et al. [3, 127] | 3 (1.76 ± 0.75, 68.6 ± 2.2) | 1.25 | 26 | 15 | 69 | 6 | 43 | 63 |
| Blazkiewicz [128] | 1 (1.85, 80) | — | 10 | -2 | 53 | 0 | 43 | 55 |
| Sridar et al. [34] | 3 (1.70 ± 0.05, 74.7 ± 8.4) | 1.0 | 22 | 11 | 62 | 2 | 40 | 60 |
| Knaepen et al. [129] | 10 (1.82 ± 0.10, 77.5 ± 11.7) | 0.69 | 14 | 8 | 62 | 8 | 48 | 54 |
| Shirota et al. [130] | 4 (1.80 ± 0.08, 74 ± 6.8) | 1.24 | 13 | 5 | 65 | 1 | 52 | 64 |
| Gordon et al. [131] | 3 (1.80 ± 0.01, 96 ± 9) | 1.0 | 6 | 0 | 55 | 16 | 49 | 55 |
| Ding et al. [132] | 8 (1.76 ± 0.06, 78.5 ± 9.9) | 1.25 | 24 | 7 | 75 | 0 | 51 | 75 |
| Winter [133], Li et al. [134] | 1 (—, 58) | 1.3 | 16 | 5 | 67 | -2 | 51 | 69 |
| Beyl et al. [135] | — | — | 22 | 8 | 64 | 1 | 42 | 63 |
| Baliunas et al. [136] | 15 (1.68 ± 0.12, 74 ± 16) | 0.98 | 17 | 3 | 60 | -2 | 43 | 62 |
| Yang et al. [137] | 1 (1.75, 70) | 1.0 | 14 | 3 | 56 | 6 | 42 | 53 |
A: first peak knee flexion angle; B: first peak knee extension angle; C: second peak knee flexion angle; D: second peak knee extension angle.