Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 15;19:20. doi: 10.1186/s12938-020-00767-2

Table 2.

Main studies using features extraction

Methods Year Data Preprocessing Features Extract No. of features Best classifiera Resultsa (%)
Acc Sp Sn
Noronha et al. [38] 2014 272 Image resize with interpolation method Higher order cumulant features 35 NB 92.65 100.00 92.00
Acharya et al. [39] 2015 510 Image resizing with histogram equalization Gabor transform 32 SVM 90.98 91.63 91.32
Issac et al. [40] 2015 67 Image resizing with statistical features Cropped input image after segmentation 3 SVM 94.11 90 100
Raja et al. [45] 2015 158 Grayscale conversion and histogram equalization Hyper-analytic wavelet transformation 16 SVM 90.14 85.66 94.30
Singh et al. [47] 2016 63 N/A Wavelet feature extraction 18 k-NN 94.75 100 90.91
Maheshwari et al. [30] 2017 488 Grayscale conversion Variational mode decomposition 4 LS-SVM 94.79 95.88 93.62
Soltani et al. [48] 2018 104 Histogram equalization and noise filtering Randomized Hough transform 4 Fuzzy logic 90.15 94.80 97.80
Koh et al. [49] 2018 2220 NA Pyramid histogram of visual words and Fisher vector 4 x 4 (grid) RF 96.05 95.32 96.29
Mohamed et al. [50] 2019 166 Color channel selection and illumination correction Superpixel feature extraction module 256 SVM 98.63 97.60 92.30
Rehman et al. [51] 2019 110 Bilateral filtering Intensity-based statistical features and texton-map histogram 2 SVM 99.30 99.40 96.90

aOnly the best results obtained in each method were left

k-NN classifier, least-squares support vector machine LS-SVM, random forest RF, naive Bayes NB, support vector machine SVM