Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 2;5(14):8242–8250. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c00524

Table 2. Reaction Screening and Optimizationa.

graphic file with name ao0c00524_0003.jpg

entry precursor loading (μmol) solvent temperature (°C) TEb (%) RCYc (%)
1 60 NMP 100 50 50
2 60 DMA 100 45 35
3d 60 DMF 100 69 ± 3 67 ± 5
4e 60 DMF 110 61 ± 12 58 ± 12
5 60 DMF 120 50 47
6 60 NMP 80 50 41
7f 60 NMP 100 53 49
8g 60 DMF 100 97 2
9h 60 DMF 110 6 5
10i 60 DMF 110 42 31
11j 60 DMF 100 6 0.01
12 30 DMF 100 48 45
13 15 DMF 100 48 40
14d,k 30 DMF 110 35 ± 3 33 ± 4
a

Unless otherwise stated, reactions were carried out using the following standard conditions and are n = 1: solvent (600 μL); 1a (19.6 μL, 60 μmol, 0.1 M); CuTC (5.3 μmol, 8.7 mM); TMEDA (0.8 mmol, 1.3 M); temperature: 100 °C; time: 5 min.

b

TE (trapping efficiency): percentage of total activity that remains in solution after acidifying the reaction mixture.

c

RCY (radiochemical yield): percentage of total activity converted to [11C]1b.

d

n = 3.

e

n = 2.

f

TMEDA (240 μL, 1.6 mmol, 2.6 M).

g

DMEDA as the base.

h

CuTC (0.1 mg, 0.52 μmol, 0.87 mM).

i

CuTC (5.4 mg, 28.6 μmol, 47.0 mM).

j

CuI as the Cu(I) source.

k

Half-quantity of all reagents: DMF (300 μL); 1a (9.8 μL, 30 μmol); CuTC (2.7 μmol); TMEDA (0.4 mmol).