Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 26;26(3):356–367. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmz048

Table I.

Characteristics of the studies for chromosomal abnormalities, uterine anomalies, antiphospholipid syndrome, thrombophilia and thyroid disorders identified in a systematic review of RPL.

Author Year Study type Study population Prevalence 2 pregnancy losses Prevalence ≥ 3 pregnancy losses Outcome measures
Chromosomal abnormalities
Michels et al. 1982 Cohort 122 couples 2 PL n = 48 ≥ 3 PL n = 74 Balanced translocations 8.4% (4/48) Balanced translocations 5.4% (4/74) Cytogenetic analysis from peripheral blood lymphocyte cultures showed no significant difference between 2 versus 3 or more pregnancy losses.
Diedrich et al. 1983 Cohort 136 couples 2 PL n = 59 ≥ 3 PL n = 77 Abnormal karyotype 10.2% (6/59) Abnormal karyotype 11.9% (9/77) Chromosomal analysis from peripheral blood lymphocyte cultures showed no significant difference between 2 versus 3 or more pregnancy losses.
FitzSimmons et al. 1983 Cohort 645 couples 2 PL n = 340 ≥ 3PL n = 305 Abnormal karyotype 1.8% (6/340) Abnormal karyotype 2.3% (7/305) Chromosomal analysis from peripheral blood lymphocyte cultures showed no significant difference between 2 versus 3 or more pregnancy losses.
Schwartz et al. 1983 Cohort 164 couples 2 PL n = 71 ≥ 3 PL n = 93 Abnormal karyotype 5.6% (4/71) Abnormal karyotype 5.4% (5/93) Chromosomal analysis from peripheral blood lymphocyte cultures showed no significant difference between 2 versus 3 or more pregnancy losses.
Sachs et al. 1985 Cohort 371 couples 2 PL n = 182 ≥ 3PL n = 189 Abnormal karyotype 9.3% (17/182) Abnormal karyotype 9.5% (18/189) Chromosomal analysis from peripheral blood lymphocyte cultures showed no significant difference between 2 versus 3 or more pregnancy losses.
Sider et al. 1988 Cohort 187 couples 2 PL n = 99 ≥ 3PL n = 88 Abnormal karyotype 3.0% (3/99) Abnormal karyotype 6.8% (6/88) Chromosomal analysis from peripheral blood lymphocyte cultures showed no significant difference between 2 versus 3 or more pregnancy losses.
Goddijn et al. 2004 Cohort 95 couples 2 PL n = 55 ≥ 3PL n = 40 Abnormal karyotype 32.7% (18/55) Abnormal karyotype 37.5% (15/40) Chromosomal analysis from peripheral blood lymphocyte cultures showed no significant difference between 2 versus 3 or more pregnancy losses.
Jaslow et al. 2010 Cohort 561 women 2 PL n = 281 ≥ 3PL n = 280 Abnormal karyotype 2.8% (8/281) Abnormal karyotype 5.4% (15/280) Parental karyotypes showed no significant difference between 2 versus 3 or more pregnancy losses.
Bashiri et al. 2012 Cohort 114 couples 2 PL n = 34 ≥ 3 PL n = 80 Abnormal karyotype (0/34) Abnormal karyotype 4.0% (4/80) Parental genetics (significant rearrangements (balanced translocations) showed no significant difference between 2 versus 3 or more pregnancy losses.
Asgari et al. 2013 Cohort 140 couples 2 PL n = 65 ≥ 3PL n = 75 Abnormal karyotype 3.1% (2/65) Abnormal karyotype 5.3% (4/75) Chromosomal analysis from peripheral blood lymphocyte cultures showed no significant difference between 2 versus 3 or more pregnancy losses.
Uterine anomalies
Weiss et al. 2005 Cohort 165 women 2 PL n = 67 ≥ 3 PL n = 98 22.4% (15/67) 17.3% (17/98) Identified by hysteroscopy. Considered abnormal were congenital anomalies. No difference in prevalence was found between 2 versus 3 or more pregnancy losses.
Bohlmann et al. 2010 Cohort 206 women 2 PL n = 78 ≥ 3 PL n = 119 9.2% (8/78) 16.8% (20/119) Identified by hysteroscopy. Considered abnormal were congenital abnormalities. No difference in prevalence was found between 2 versus 3 or more pregnancy losses.
Jaslow et al. 2010 Cohort 875 women 2 PL n = 401 ≥ 3PL n = 303 18.7% (75/401) 18.2% (55/303) Identified by hysterosalpingogram, hysteroscopy, sonohysterography. Considered abnormal were congenital anomalies, fibroids, polyps and septa, Asherman’s syndrome adhesions. No difference in prevalence was found between 2 versus 3 or more pregnancy losses.
De Souza et al. 2011 Cohort 66 women 2 PL n = 23 ≥ 3 PL n = 43 17.3% (4/23) 11.6% (5/43) Identified by hysteroscopy. Considered abnormal was congenital anomalies. No difference in prevalence was found between 2 versus 3 or more pregnancy losses.
Seckin et al. 2012 Cohort 220 women 2 PL n = 151 ≥ 3 PL n = 69 26.5% (40/151) 30.4% (21/69) Diagnostic hysteroscopy. Considered abnormal was congenital anomaly. No difference in prevalence was found between 2 versus 3 or more pregnancy losses.
Bashiri et al. 2012 Cohort 114 women 2 PL n = 38 ≥ 3 PL n = 78 31.6% (12/38) 23.1% (18/78) Hysteroscopy or 3D ultrasound. Considered abnormal were septate uterus, unicornuate, bicornuate, fibroids, polyps and Asherman’s syndrome. No difference in prevalence was found between 2 versus 3 or more pregnancy losses.
Jaslow et al. 2013 Cohort 875 women 2 PL n = 389 ≥ 3 PL n = 486 6.7% (26/389) 7.2% (35/486) Three dimensional sonohysterography. Considered abnormal were congenital and acquired abnormalities. No difference in prevalence was found between 2 versus 3 or more pregnancy losses.
Antiphospholipid syndrome
Jaslow et al. 2010 Cohort 729 women 2 PL n = 409 ≥ 3 PL n = 320 15.6% (64/409) 13.1% (42/320) Lupus anticoagulant levels, Anticardiolipin IgG and IgM were measured. No difference was found between 2 versus 3 or more pregnancy losses.
Bashiri et al. 2012 Cohort 120 women 2 PL n = 39 ≥ 3 PL n = 81 10.3% (4/39) 13.6 (11/81) Lupus anticoagulant. No difference in prevalence was found between 2 versus 3 or more pregnancy losses.
Van den Boogaard et al. 2013 Cohort 2444 women 2 PL n = 1526 ≥ 3 PL n = 918 17.4% (265/1526) 17.3% (159/918) Lupus anticoagulant levels, Anticardiolipin IgG and IgM were measured. No difference was found between 2 versus 3 or more pregnancy losses.
Thrombophilia
Sotiriadis et al. 2007 Cohort 99 women 2 PL n = 56 ≥ 3 PL n = 43 2 PL = 56 3 PL = 43 There was no difference in the distribution of Factor V Leiden, FII G20210A and MTHFR between patients with 2 and 3 or more PLs.
Jaslow et al. 2010 Cohort 243 women Factor V Leiden 4.2% (6/144) Prothrombin gene mutation 2.6% (3/115) Protein S 3.5% (4/115) Protein S 0.9% (1/115) Factor V Leiden 8.1% (8/99) Prothrombin gene mutation (0/85) Protein S 2.4% (2/85) Protein C (0/85) Factor V Leiden mutation, prothrombin gene mutation, protein C activity, protein S activity. No difference was found between 2 versus 3 or more pregnancy losses.
Bashiri et al. 2012 Cohort 120 women Factor V Leiden 4.8% (1/21) Prothrombin gene mutation 13.6% (3/22) Protein S 3.8% (1/26) Protein C 7.7% (2/26) Factor V Leiden 17.0% (8/47) Prothrombin gene mutation 4.5% (2/44) Protein S 13.6% (8/59) Protein C 8.2% (5/61) Factor V Leiden mutation, prothrombin gene mutation, Protein S activity, Protein C activity. No difference was found between 2 versus 3 or more pregnancy losses.
Karadeniz et al. 2012 Cohort 108 women 2 PL n = 42 ≥ 3 PL n = 66 Factor V Leiden 9.5% (4/42) Prothrombin gene mutation (0/42) Protein S 16.6% (7/42) Protein C 16.6% (7/42) Factor V Leiden 7.5% (5/66) Prothrombin gene mutation 1.5% (1/66) Protein S 12.2% (8/66) Protein C 18.2% (12/66) Factor V Leiden mutation, prothrombin gene mutation, Protein S activity, Protein C activity. No difference was found between 2 versus 3 or more pregnancy losses.
Baumann et al. 2013 Cohort 641 women 2 PL n = 240 ≥ 3 PL n = 401 Factor V Leiden 8.3% (20/240) Prothrombin gene mutation 2.9% (7/240) Factor V Leiden 7.2% (29/401) Prothrombin gene mutation 3.5% (14/401) Factor V Leiden, prothrombin gene mutation. No difference was found between 2 versus 3 or more pregnancy losses.
Ali et al. 2014 Cohort 250 patients 2 PL n = 125 ≥ 3 PL n = 125 Factor V Leiden (0/23) Prothrombin gene mutation (0/175) Protein S 1.1% (2/175) Protein C 1.1% (2/175) Factor V Leiden 11.5% (3/26) Prothrombin gene mutation 1.4% (2/140) Protein S 4.3% (6/140) Protein C 4.3% (6/140) Factor V Leiden mutation, prothrombin gene mutation, protein C activity, protein S activity. No difference was found between 2 versus 3 or more pregnancy losses.
Guzel et al. 2015 Cohort 252 women 2 PL n = 72 ≥ 3 PL n = 180 Protein S deficiency (84.18 ± 11.69) Protein C deficiency (90.91 ± 23.35) Protein S deficiency (89.02 ± 22.47) Protein C deficiency (106.57 ± 68.79) Protein S deficiency and protein C deficiency. No difference was found between 2 versus 3 or more pregnancy losses.
Thyroid disorders
Jaslow et al. 2010 Cohort 687 women 2 PL n = 396 ≥ 3 PL n = 291 Abnormal TSH 8.0% (32/396) Abnormal TSH 6.5% (19/291) Serum levels of TSH < 0.45 mU/ml or > 4.5 mU/ml
Bashiri et al. 2012 Cohort 118 women 2 PL n = 38 ≥ 3 PL n = 80 Abnormal TSH 2.6% (1/38) Abnormal TSH 16.3%(13/80) Serum levels of TSH < 0.45 mU/ml or > 4.5 mU/ml.

PL, pregnancy loss; TSH: thyroid-stimulating hormone, MTHFR: methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase.