Amlie 1987.
| Methods | RCT; double‐blind, parallel placebo‐controlled multicentre trial. Randomisation procedure not described Follow‐up time: 7 days |
|
| Participants |
Population: 282 participants, 116 women, 166 men Setting: 27 GPs, company doctors, and rheumatologists participated in the trial, conducted in Norway Inclusion criteria: acute LBP, onset within the previous 48 hours, free from LBP for the last 3 months, age 18 years to 60 years Exclusion criteria: radicular symptoms, ankylosing spondylitis, rheumatoid arthritis, history of peptic ulcer or severe dyspepsia, hypersensitivity to aspirin or other NSAIDs, pregnancy or lactation; and any other hematologic, hepatic, renal, pulmonary, cardiac, or systemic disease |
|
| Interventions | NSAID (i): piroxicam 20 mg capsules, single daily dose of 40 mg (2 capsules) for the first two days, then single daily dose of 20 mg (1 capsule) for the next 5 days; 7 days (N = 140). Reference treatment (ii): placebo capsules, single daily dose of 40 mg (2 capsules) for the first two days, then single daily dose of 20 mg (1 capsule) for the next 5 days; 7 days (N = 142). | |
| Outcomes | (i) More pain relief than (ii) measured with visual analogue scale after 3 days. After 7 days no significant differences Consumption of additional analgesics: (i) 49 (N = 134) versus (ii) 62 (N = 132), with a mean consumption of 3.2 (i) versus 5.9 (ii) tablets after 7 days. Return to work after 7 days: (i) 42 (N = 134) versus (ii) 28 participants. Adverse effects: similar (i) 18 (13%) (ii) 24 (17%) |
|
| Funding | Study supported by Pfizer, developer of Piroxicam | |
| Notes | ||
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Randomisation procedure not described |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not mentioned |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes ‐ participants | Low risk | To maintain double‐blind conditions, placebo capsules of identical appearance were administered in the same way as the study drug. |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes ‐ careproviders | Low risk | Double‐blind, double‐dummy |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes ‐ outcome assessors | Unclear risk | Not mentioned |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes ‐ dropouts | Low risk | Low dropout rate: 5,6%. (i) 6/140 withdrew. (ii) 10/142 withdrew. (16/242) |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes ‐ ITT analysis | High risk | No ITT analysis performed |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | No study protocol |
| Similarity at baseline characteristics | Low risk | Baseline characteristics similar |
| Co‐interventions avoided or similar | Low risk | Paracetamol 500 mg, maximum 6 to 8 tablets a day, was used as rescue medication. In a very few cases, a combination of paracetamol and codeine was permitted for more severe pain. The consumption of rescue analgesics was recorded for each participant during the trial. |
| Compliance acceptable | Unclear risk | Compliance not mentioned; they do mention that 12 withdrawals were due to protocol violations. |
| Timing outcome assessments similar | Low risk | Timing similar |
| Other bias | Low risk | None |