Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 16;2020(4):CD013581. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013581

Lacey 1984.

Methods RCT; double‐blind, placebo‐controlled. Randomisation procedure not described.
Follow‐up time: 14 days
Information extracted from subgroup with acute back sprain
Participants Population: subgroup of 337 participants with acute back or sacroiliac pain (< 72 hours). Age and sex ratio unknown
Setting: 215 participating general practitioners, conducted in the United Kingdom
Inclusion criteria: acute back or sacroiliac pain, diagnosed within the last 72 hours or less
Exclusion criteria: not mentioned
Interventions NSAID (i): piroxicam 10 mg capsules, four times per day first two days, two times per day next 12 days; 14 days (N = 168)
 Reference treatment (ii): identical placebo capsules, four times per day first two days, two times per day next 12 days; 14 days (N = 169)
Outcomes Participant (%) improved after 1 week only in subgroups with initial moderate/severe pain (i) 82%/49% (ii) 53%/38%. No differences for subgroup with mild initial pain. Results after 2 weeks not reported.
No data presented on adverse events for subgroup with back pain. The overall numbers, including other musculoskeletal disorders, were similar: (i) 12% (3% withdrew) (ii) 9% (2,5% withdrew).
Funding Not mentioned. Statistical help was given by an employee of Pfizer Central Research.
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomisation procedure not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not mentioned
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes ‐ participants Low risk Double‐blind, identical placebo capsules
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes ‐ careproviders Low risk Double‐blind, identical placebo capsules
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes ‐ outcome assessors Unclear risk Not mentioned
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes ‐ dropouts Unclear risk Not mentioned for subgroup
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes ‐ ITT analysis Unclear risk Not mentioned
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No study protocol
Similarity at baseline characteristics Unclear risk Baseline characteristics not mentioned for subgroup
Co‐interventions avoided or similar Unclear risk Not mentioned
Compliance acceptable Unclear risk Not mentioned
Timing outcome assessments similar Low risk Timing similar
Other bias Low risk None