Stratz 1990.
Methods | RCT; single‐blind, multicentre study. Randomization procedure not described. Article in German. Follow‐up time: 3‐5 days (baseline and final measurements; maximum follow‐up time 2 days after the last IM injection). |
|
Participants |
Population: 96 participants with acute LBP, 49 women, 47 men; mean age 50.8 years, aged between 16 and 78 years Setting: participants visiting four participating physicians, conducted in Germany Inclusion criteria: first episode of acute lumbago, or acute onset after a long symptom‐free period Exclusion criteria: age < 14 years, pregnancy or lactation, allergy, current use of corticosteroid or anti‐rheumatic treatment with half‐life > 24 hours, other NSAIDs or anticoagulant treatment |
|
Interventions | NSAID (i): diclofenac‐natrium IM 3 mL (= 75mg), 1 to 3 injections (with a minimum of 16 hours between injections), 1 to 3 days (N = 47) NSAID (ii): etofenamat (Rheumon®) IM 2 mL (= 1000 mg), 1 to 3 injections (with a minimum of 16 hours between injections), 1 to 3 days (N = 49) | |
Outcomes | Similar amount of IM injections was needed in both groups, no significant differences. Mean pain score (11‐point NRS), at baseline and after 3 to 5 days: (i) 5.3, 2.7, (ii) 5.3, 2.4 No. of participants recovered after 3 to 5 days (therapeutic success: 'good' or 'very good'): (i) 27/47, (ii) 34/49. Not significant Adverse events: (i) 2 (none withdrew), (ii) 0 (none withdrew) |
|
Funding | Not mentioned | |
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Randomisation procedure not described |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not mentioned |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes ‐ participants | Low risk | participants were blinded; procedure not described |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes ‐ careproviders | High risk | Careproviders were not blinded |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes ‐ outcome assessors | Unclear risk | Not mentioned |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes ‐ dropouts | Low risk | Low dropout rate: 1/96 = 1% |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes ‐ ITT analysis | Unclear risk | Not mentioned |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | No study protocol |
Similarity at baseline characteristics | Unclear risk | Baseline characteristics similar according to text, but no Table 1 available. |
Co‐interventions avoided or similar | Low risk | No use of anti‐rheumatica, anti‐flogisti or analgesic medication other than study drug. No use of corticosteroids. If further treatment with oral or topical NSAIDs was necessary after injections, this was recorded. This was the case in (i) 28/47 (60%) and (ii) 23/49 (47%) of the participants. |
Compliance acceptable | Low risk | 1 person in group (i) (diclofenac IM) withdrew after the first injection, because of no benefit. All the others seemed to have complied to the treatment and follow‐up program. |
Timing outcome assessments similar | High risk | Timing not similar; final measurements 2 days after last injection, this could be either after the first, second, or third injection. |
Other bias | Low risk | None |