Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 16;2020(4):CD013581. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013581

Stratz 1990.

Methods RCT; single‐blind, multicentre study. Randomization procedure not described. Article in German.
Follow‐up time: 3‐5 days (baseline and final measurements; maximum follow‐up time 2 days after the last IM injection).
Participants Population: 96 participants with acute LBP, 49 women, 47 men; mean age 50.8 years, aged between 16 and 78 years
Setting: participants visiting four participating physicians, conducted in Germany
Inclusion criteria: first episode of acute lumbago, or acute onset after a long symptom‐free period
Exclusion criteria: age < 14 years, pregnancy or lactation, allergy, current use of corticosteroid or anti‐rheumatic treatment with half‐life > 24 hours, other NSAIDs or anticoagulant treatment
Interventions NSAID (i): diclofenac‐natrium IM 3 mL (= 75mg), 1 to 3 injections (with a minimum of 16 hours between injections), 1 to 3 days (N = 47)
 NSAID (ii): etofenamat (Rheumon®) IM 2 mL (= 1000 mg), 1 to 3 injections (with a minimum of 16 hours between injections), 1 to 3 days (N = 49)
Outcomes Similar amount of IM injections was needed in both groups, no significant differences.
Mean pain score (11‐point NRS), at baseline and after 3 to 5 days: (i) 5.3, 2.7, (ii) 5.3, 2.4
No. of participants recovered after 3 to 5 days (therapeutic success: 'good' or 'very good'): (i) 27/47, (ii) 34/49. Not significant
Adverse events: (i) 2 (none withdrew), (ii) 0 (none withdrew)
Funding Not mentioned
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomisation procedure not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not mentioned
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes ‐ participants Low risk participants were blinded; procedure not described
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes ‐ careproviders High risk Careproviders were not blinded
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes ‐ outcome assessors Unclear risk Not mentioned
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes ‐ dropouts Low risk Low dropout rate: 1/96 = 1%
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes ‐ ITT analysis Unclear risk Not mentioned
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No study protocol
Similarity at baseline characteristics Unclear risk Baseline characteristics similar according to text, but no Table 1 available.
Co‐interventions avoided or similar Low risk No use of anti‐rheumatica, anti‐flogisti or analgesic medication other than study drug. No use of corticosteroids. If further treatment with oral or topical NSAIDs was necessary after injections, this was recorded. This was the case in (i) 28/47 (60%) and (ii) 23/49 (47%) of the participants.
Compliance acceptable Low risk 1 person in group (i) (diclofenac IM) withdrew after the first injection, because of no benefit. All the others seemed to have complied to the treatment and follow‐up program.
Timing outcome assessments similar High risk Timing not similar; final measurements 2 days after last injection, this could be either after the first, second, or third injection.
Other bias Low risk None